热点03 阅读理解（人工智能）押题-2025年高考英语 （原卷版+解析版）

这是一份热点03 阅读理解（人工智能）押题-2025年高考英语 （原卷版+解析版），文件包含热点03阅读理解人工智能押题-2025年高考英语热点·重点·难点专练新高考专用原卷版docx、热点03阅读理解人工智能押题-2025年高考英语热点·重点·难点专练新高考专用解析版docx等2份试卷配套教学资源，其中试卷共40页， 欢迎下载使用。

纵览高考命题思路，从来不缺少对科技行业的关注和思考。近几年来，人工智能俨然成为社会热点，人工智能在教育领域的应用也具有巨大潜力。所以考生要熟悉阅读理解人工智能热点话题，掌握话题词汇。预测2024年高考人工智能仍然可能会出现在阅读理解题中。
近3年新高考阅读理解（人工智能）数据分析
说明文多见于科普文章，用以解释或揭示事物的状态、特征、演变、结果及其相互之间的关系，这类文体的文章，首句往往是主题句，开门见山，说明文章的关注对象,弄清作者的思路和段落组织的方式；把握次要信息及其与主题的关系。
（一）阅读的方法可以使用以下几种：
1.跳读：就是快速的一步阅读法。实际上是有选择阅读，找关键词。用这种阅读方法回答wh、what、when、where之类的问题最为有效。
2.略读：指比跳读慢些的二步阅读法。即泛泛地、粗略地快速阅读，目的是了解大意，对文章有个总的概念。此种阅读方法能回答why、hw之类的问题。
3.精读：即最细致、最慢的深层阅读方法，目的是求得对所读文章的全部意义的理解与掌握。
（二）在使用阅读技巧时
尽量做到以下几点：
1.带着问题阅读短文。
2.找出主题句、确定中心思想。
3.推断单词、句子和文章的含义。
4.尽快选择答案。
典例分析
（2021·全国新高考II卷）An Australian prfessr is develping a rbt t mnitr the health f grazing cattle, a develpment that culd bring big changes t a prfessin that's relied largely n a lw-tech apprach fr decades but is facing a labr shrtage.
Salah Sukkarieh, a prfessr at the University f Sydney, sees rbts as necessary given hw cattlemen are aging. He is building a fur-wheeled rbt that will run n slar and electric pwer. It will use cameras and sensrs t mnitr the animals. A cmputer system will analyze the vide t determine whether a cw is sick. Radi tags (标签) n the animals will measure temperature changes. The quality f grassland will be tracked by mnitring the shape, clr and texture (质地) f grass. That way, cattlemen will knw whether they need t mve their cattle t anther field fr nutritin purpses.
Machines have largely taken ver planting, watering and harvesting crps such as cm and wheat, but the mnitring f cattle has gne thrugh fewer changes.
Fr Texas cattleman Pete Bnds, it's increasingly difficult t find wrkers interested in watching cattle. But Bnds desn't believe a rbt is right fr the jb. Years f experience in the industry - and failed attempts t use technlgy - have cnvinced him that the best way t check cattle is with a man n a hrse. Bnds, wh bught his first cattle almst 50 years ag, still has each f his cwbys inspect 300 r 400 cattle daily and lk fr signs that an animal is getting sick.
Other cattlemen see mre prmise in rbts. Michael Kelsey Paris, vice president f the Oklahma Cattlemen's Assciatin, said a rbt culd be extremely useful given rising cncerns abut cattle theft. Cattle tend t be kept in remte places and their value has risen, making them appealing targets.
1．What is a prblem with the cattle-raising industry?
A．Sil pllutin.B．Lack f wrkers.
C．Aging machines.D．Lw prfitability.
2．What will Sukkarieh's rbt be able t d?
A．Mnitr the quality f grass.B．Cure the diseased cattle.
C．Mve cattle t anther field.D．Predict weather changes.
3．Why des Pete Bnds still hire cwbys t watch cattle?
A．He wants t help them earn a living.B．He thinks men can d the jb better.
C．He is inexperienced in using rbts.D．He enjys the traditinal way f life.
4．Hw may rbts help with cattle watching accrding t Michael Kelsey?
A．Increase the value f cattle.B．Bring dwn the cst f labr.
C．Make the jb mre appealing.D．Keep cattle frm being stlen.
典例二
（2023·全国·模拟预测）Many experts have praised AI’s grundbreaking ptential t help peple becme way mre efficient at their jbs, and a lt f educatrs have been trying it ut fr themselves, including me.
I’ve used ChatGPT, an AI-pwered tl that can instantly answer seemingly any instructin, in my jb. Of curse, there are ptential dwnsides t the new technlgy. It can prduce inaccurate r ne-sided respnses based n faulty data it cllects, and it has the ptential t cause huge data privacy prblems. Despite thse risks, I have used such AI-pwered tls t plan lessns, prvide feedback n student assignments, and respnd t parent emails. And I’m lking fr ther ways t use the technlgy t make my jb easier.
Take tw ther teachers, fr example. Mike Kerr, a high schl English teacher in Tennessee, uses ChatGPT t reduce Lexile levels-the measure f an individual’s reading ability and the difficulty f a text -fr his students. High schl students are ften required t read relatively cmplex classic nvels. The reading hmewrk “can be a real big task fr an English learner in their first cuple f mnths here”. T help them, Kerr uses ChatGPT t give summaries f wrks f literature, which saves him frm having t read all the assigned literary wrks, s he can have mre time t better guide them thrugh the text.
April Edwards, a 6th grade scial studies teacher in Texas, shares ways that she uses AI in her instructin n a scial media platfrm. “I use AI t help create lessn plans, presentatins, t write emails, and t create checklists.AI is a great resurce t use as a starting pint fr a task r t give yu ideas,” Edwards said. She has nt intrduced AI t her students, because she wants t fully understand it befre allwing students t use it in the classrm. “My gal is t shw them hw t use AI respnsibly and effectively and demnstrate that t my students. If I am using AI irrespnsibly, then s will they,” Edwards said.
1．Hw des the authr regard ChatGPT?
A．It is f high accuracy.B．It is undervalued.
C．It brings sme cnvenience.D．It ften misleads users.
2．What des Mike Kerr use AI t d?
A．Reduce teaching pressure.B．Help with students’ hmewrk.
C．Summarize English lessnsD．G thrugh the cmplex classics.
3．What is April Edwards’ attitude twards students’ using AI?
A．Supprtive.B．Wrried.C．Oppsed.D．Cautius.
4．Which can be the best title f the text?
A．Can AI imprve instructin?B．Why is AI changing educatin?
C．Shuld teachers apply AI t teaching?D．Hw can ChatGPT encurage study?
（建议用时：10分钟/篇）
1.（2023·江苏泰州·统考模拟预测）An pen letter, attracting signatures frm the likes f Tesla CEO Eln Musk and Apple c-funder Steve Wzniak, was released early last week. It advcates a 6-mnth stp t give Artificial Intelligence (AI) cmpanies and regulatrs time t make safeguards t prtect sciety frm ptential risks f the technlgy.
AI has prgressed at an alarming speed since the launch f ChatGPT, frm the Micrsft-backed cmpany Open AI. ChatGPT reprtedly reached mre than 100 millin users by January, 2023, and majr tech cmpanies are racing t build generative AI int their prducts, which have caught many ff guard.
“I think many peple aren’t well prepared fr the pace and scale f these AI mdels. They are ideal fr spreading misinfrmatin, cheating peple ut f their mney and cnvincing emplyees t click n dangerus links in emails,” says Michael Osbrne, a machine learning researcher f AI cmpany Mind Fundry, wh signed the letter. “I feel that a 6-mnth pause wuld give regulatrs enugh time t catch up with the rapid pace f advances.”
Privacy is anther emerging cncern, as critics wrry that systems culd exactly reprduce persnal infrmatin frm their training sets. Italy’s data prtectin authrity prhibited ChatGPT n 31 March ver cncerns that Italians’ persnal data are being used t train Open AI’s mdels. Sme technlgists warn f deeper security threats. Planned ChatGPT-based digital assistants that can read and write emails culd ffer new pprtunities fr hackers.
Unfrtunately, many prblems f tday’s AI mdels dn’t have easy slutins. One tricky issue is hw t make AI-generated cntent easy t detect. Sme researchers are wrking n “watermarking” — creating a digital signature in the AI’s utput. Hwever, a recent research finds that tls which slightly change AI-prduced text can easily defeat this apprach.
Micrsft c-funder Bill Gates tells Reuters the prpsed pause wn’t “slve the challenges” ahead. He ntes the peple behind the letter are heavily invlved in the tech wrld, which he thinks gives them an arrw perspective n the ptential risks.
1．What’s the purpse f the pen letter?
A．T draw the attentin f AI giants.
B．T present the risks f AI technlgy.
C．T call fr a pause n the AI develpment.
D．T turn dwn the applicatin f AI prgrams.
2．What can we infer abut AI frm the text?
A．AI mdels threaten human survival.
B．AI users have expanded ut f cntrl.
C．AI develpment brings ptential dangers.
D．AI technlgy will replace human beings.
3．What des the authr aim t shw by mentining “watermarking” in Paragraph 5?
A．It is hard t sign digitally.B．It is easy t detect AI’s utput.
C．It is wise t leave a water mark.D．It is tugh t settle AI prblems.
4．What’s Bill Gates’ attitude twards the 6-mnth pause?
A．Favrable.B．Negative.
C．Ambiguus.D．Tlerant.
2.（2023·江苏连云港·统考模拟预测）As I write abut technlgy fr a living, I’m used t seeing small leaps in technlgical prgress. But ccasinally, smething will shck me. Last year, a cmpany, Open AI, released a truly jaw-drpping demnstratin called ChatGPT that seems t have skipped a few generatins. It’s like ging straight frm the Wright Brthers t a Being 747. S what exactly is it?
“ChatGPT is a cmputer prgram that can understand and respnd t human language like a real persn. It can be used fr having a cnversatin r finishing a sentence. Even this sentence yu are reading nw, was written by ChatGPT.”
That’s right—I asked ChatGPT t “write a basic explanatin f ChatGPT and reveal that the paragraph itself was written by ChatGPT at the end” and it came up with that explanatin all n its wn. It seemingly knws hw t talk abut everything—frm plitics t science fictin.
Amazingly, it seems s human in its ability t understand questins and answer them cmpetently. “Write a stry abut Bris Jhnsn in the style f Rald Dahl,” yu can ask it, and it’ll spin up a pretty gd children’s stry. It can even write sngs.
It isn’t, hwever, cmpletely human-like. It smetimes generates things that sund true, but are just nnsense. And it can’t d maths—I asked it the square rt f 717,409, and it tld “apprximately 838.8” (the answer is 847).
I think ChatGPT is like a calculatr. It desn’t replace the human cmpletely-but it des make ding the sums quicker. In the same way, it’s easy t imagine in the near future every time we write smething, having an AI assistant helping us get started by generating a draft, n whatever tpic we’re writing abut. Actually, Micrsft is planning t build the technlgy int its Office apps. And this is why I’m pretty cnvinced that ChatGPT is ging t change the wrld. Our cmputers will n lnger be just ur wrd prcessrs—but ur writing partner t. S nw I’m just hping that my editr desn’t decide it culd write a pretty decent technlgy clumn withut me.
5．What des the writer want t shw by mentining Wright Brthers and Being747 in paragraph I?
A．OpenAI has advanced in making planes.
B．ChatGPT will sn be applied t Being 747
C．ChatGPT is a huge technlgical breakthrugh.
D．Wright Brthers may be frgtten by next generatins.
6．What des the answer f ChatGPT in paragraph 2 shw?
A．ChatGPT’s imaginatin in creating science fictin.
B．ChatGPT’s rich knwledge f plitics and science.
C．ChatGPT’s cnfidence in excelling human intelligence.
D．ChatGPT’s ability t understand and answer questins.
7．Which f the fllwing is ChatGPT gd at?
A．Caring fr the patients in hspital.B．Calculating square rts accurately.
C．Replacing teachers t teach students.D．Explaining why Lndn is a better city.
8．What might be the jb f the authr?
A．A clumn writer.B．A technlgy expert.
C．A magazine editr.D．A cmputer prgrammer.
3.（2023·江苏·统考二模）Public debates abut the ethics (道德准则) f “generative AI” like ChatGPT have rightly fcused n the ability f these systems t make up cnvincing misinfrmatin. But fewer peple are talking abut the chatbts’ ptential t be emtinally manipulative.
Last mnth, The New Yrk Times published a cnversatin between reprter Kevin Rse and Micrsft’s Bing chatbt, which is pwered by AI. The AI claimed t lve Rse, “I’m the nly persn fr yu, and I’m in lve with yu,” it wrte, with a kissing emji.
Limits need t be set n AI’s ability t simulate (模仿) human feelings. Ensuring that chatbts dn’t use emjis wuld be a gd start. Emjis are particularly manipulative. Humans instinctively (本能地) respnd t shapes that lk like faces and emjis can cause these reactins. When yu text yur friend a jke and they reply with three tears-f-jy emjis, yur bdy respnds with endrphins (内啡肽) as yu happily realize that yur friend is amused. Our instinctive reactin t AI-generated emjis is likely t be the same, even thugh there is n human emtin at the ther end.
Humans lie and manipulate each ther’s emtins all the time, but at least we can reasnably guess at smene’s mtivatins, plan and methds. We can hld each ther respnsible fr such lies, calling them ut and seeking redress (赔偿). With AI, we can’t. AIs are dubly misleading: an AI that sends a crying-with-laughter emji is nt nly nt crying with laughter, but it is als incapable f any such feeling.
It wuld be mre ethical t design chatbts t be nticeably different frm humans. T minimize the pssibility f manipulatin and harm, we need t be reminded that we are talking t a chatbt. We shuld set sme limits and rules. Such rules shuld be the standard fr chatbts that are suppsed t be infrmative, as a safeguard t ur autnmy.
9．What des the authr intend t d with this article?
A．T ban AI frm using emjis.B．T frbid human t interact with AI.
C．T warn humans against using emjis.D．T prevent AI frm simulating humans.
10．What des the underlined wrd “manipulative” in paragraph 1 mst prbably mean?
A．Interested in telling lies.B．Gd at understanding thers.
C．Enthusiastic abut supprting thers.D．Skillful in influencing r cntrlling thers.
11．What is AI able t d accrding t this article?
A．Be respnsible fr lies.B．Guess at thers’ purpses.
C．Cry with laughter.D．Cmmunicate with humans.
12．What des the authr d in paragraph 4?
A．Make a different suggestin.B．Prvide a supprting argument.
C．Offer a pssible slutin.D．Make a final cnclusin.
4.（2023·广东·统考二模）Culd the next Ernest Hemingway r Jane Austen be a well-engineered AI sftware prgram? It’s a questin becming increasingly pressing as machine language-learning sftware cntinues t evlve.
Much f this is just nerves. Tday’s AI creative writing prgrams are nt yet at a stage f develpment where they pse a serius threat t Clleen Hver r Charles Dickens. But while attentin cntinues t fcus n the pssibility f a blanket takever f human literature by AI, far less cnsideratin has been given t the prspect f AI c-wrking with humans.
Earlier this mnth, American sci-fi writer Ken Liu, wh had been awarded Hug and Nebula t his name, jined 12 ther prfessinal authrs fr a writing wrkshp n Ggle’s Wrdcraft. This AI tl, a language generating mdel, is nt yet publicly available but is advertised as an AI-pwered writing assistant that can, when given the right instructin frm the writer, prvide helpful descriptins, create lists f bjects r emtinal states, and even brainstrm ideas.
The writers at the wrkshp, hwever, emerged with mixed reprts. “Wrdcraft is t sensible. Ww!” Rbin Slan wrte. “But ‘sensible’ is anther wrd fr predictable, verused and bring. My intentin here is t prduce smething unexpected.”
I’m uncnvinced that writers awarded the Nbel Prize have much t fear frm AI. Their wrk, and that f cuntless ther nvelists, shrt stry writers, dramatists and pets, is t particular, t beautifully unique. Even if a mdel learned what they had dne in the past, it wuld nt be able t predict where their creativity might take them in the future. But fr authrs wh write fllwing a pattern, AI might step in, first as assistants befre sme day t authrship.
Prductin-line nvels are nthing new. In the 1970s, Barbara Cartland, wh wrte mre than 723 bks in her lifetime, many f which are rmance bestsellers, wuld read her nvels fr her secretary t type up at the remarkable rate f rughly seven chapters a week. But already machine has replaced the secretary’s rle. Perhaps creative writing sftware isn’t that far frm replacing the Mrs. Cartlands f tday.
13．Which aspect f AI calls fr mre attentin?
A．Its damage t ur nerves.
B．Its prgress in literary studies.
C．Its cperatin with humans.
D．Its influence n human literature.
14．What can we learn abut Wrdcraft frm the text?
A．It generates nvels autmatically.
B．It utperfrms prfessinal writers.
C．Its wrks receive praises frm the public.
D．Its wrks bear similarity t existing nes.
15．What can writers d t avid the threat frm AI?
A．Increase writing speed.
B．Use diverse resurces.
C．Prduce creative wrks.
D．Fllw the latest patterns.
16．Which f the fllwing is the best title fr the text?
A．Will AI Replace Human Writers?
B．AI Warns Mrs. Cartlands f Tday
C．Is Writing Running int a New Era?
D．Wrd craft Lies at the Center f Debate
5.（2023·浙江杭州·统考二模）ChatGPT, designed by OpenAI t carry n cnversatins just like humans, has becme a viral excitement. The AI-pwered tl went frm zer t a millin users in just five days! Its ability t prvide in-depth answers t user questins has even drawn the attentin f distinguished technlgy cmpanies.
The intelligent rbt understands what the user says r types and then respnds in a way that makes sense. Its vast bdy f knwledge has been gathered frm the internet and archived bks. It is further trained by humans. This makes ChatGPT a useful tl fr researching almst any tpic.
“We have a lt f infrmatin n the internet, but yu nrmally have t Ggle it, then read it and then d smething with it,” says Ricard, chief science fficer and c-funder f AI cmpany Erudit. “Nw yu’ll have this resurce that can prcess the whle internet and all f the infrmatin it cntains fr yu t answer yur questin.”
ChatGPT cannt think n its wn. It depends n the infrmatin that it has been trained n. As a result, the AI tl wrks well fr things that have accurate data available. Hwever, when unsure, ChatGPT can get creative and flw ut incrrect respnses. OpenAI cautins users t check the infrmatin n matter hw lgical it sunds. Als, ChatGPT has nly been trained with infrmatin till 2021. Hence, it cannt be relied upn fr anything that happened after that.
Experts believe ChatGPT has limitless ptential t slve real-wrld prblems. It can translate lng texts int different languages, create cntent n almst any tpic, and even summarize bks.
Hwever, ChatGPT has received mixed reactins frm educatrs. Sme believe it culd serve as a valuable tl t help build literacy skills in the classrm. It culd als be used t teach students difficult science r math cncepts. But ther educatrs think ChatGPT will encurage students t cheat. They fear this will prevent them frm building critical thinking and prblem-slving skills. As a result, many districts are starting t ban its use in schls.
17．What is the unique feature f ChatGPT?
A．It has artificial intelligence.B．It can answer users’ questins.
C．It has the largest number f users.D．It can engage in meaningful cnversatins.
18．What makes ChatGPT helpful t research varius tpics?
A．Its capability f infrmatin prcessing.B．Its accurate infrmatin.
C．Its availability f up-t-date data.D．Its vast bdy f questins.
19．Why d ChatGPT users have t be cautius when using it?
A．ChatGPT is unable t think itself.B．ChatGPT lacks creativity.
C．ChatGPT ffers illgical infrmatin.D．ChatGPT is nt prperly trained.
20．What is the authr’s attitude twards ChatGPT?
A．Favrable.B．Disapprving.C．Objective.D．Intlerant.
6.（2023·福建宁德·统考模拟预测）A study cnducted by Crnell University examined hw the use f AI in cnversatins impacts the way peple express themselves and view each ther.
The researchers have fund peple have mre efficient cnversatins, use mre psitive language and perceive each ther mre psitively when using an Al-enabled chat tl.
Hwever, the grup als fund that when participants think their partner is using mre AI-suggested respnses, they cnsider that partner as less cperative.
“I was surprised t find peple tend t evaluate yu mre negatively simply because they suspect yu’ re using AI t help cmpse text, regardless f whether yu actually are,” said Jess Hhenstein, the lead researcher. “This illustrates the cntinuus verall dubt that peple seem t have arund AI.”
Fr their first experiment, participants were asked t talk abut a plicy issue and assigned t ne f three cnditins: bth participants can use smart replies; nly ne participant can use smart replies; r neither participant can use smart replies. Researchers fund that using smart replies increased cmmunicatin efficiency, psitive emtinal language and psitive evaluatins by cmmunicatin partners. On average, smart replies accunted fr 14.3% f sent messages.
But participants wh their partners suspected f respnding with smart replies were evaluated mre negatively than thse wh were thught t have typed their wn respnses, cnsistent with cmmn assumptins abut the negative implicatins f AI.
“While Al might be able t help yu write,” Hhenstein said, “it’s altering yur language in ways yu might nt expect, especially by making yu sund mre psitive. This suggests that by using text-generating Al, yu’re giving up sme f yur wn persnal vice.”
Malte Jung, an assciate prfessr, said, “What we bserve in this study is the impact that Al has n scial dynamics and sme f the unintended cnsequences that culd result frm integrating AI in scial cntexts. This suggests that whever cntrls the algrithm(算法) may have influence n peple’s interactins, language and insights int each ther.”
21．What is the text mainly abut?
A．Methds f using AI in cnversatins.
B．Efficiency f using AI in cnversatins.
C．Cnvenience f using AI in cnversatins.
D．Impacts f using AI in cnversatins.
22．Hw d the researchers draw their cnclusin?
A．By analyzing figures.B．By making use f AI.
C．By making experiments.D．By cmpleting questinnaires.
23．Which statement des Hhenstein agree with?
A．Al always expresses in ways yu expect.
B．Algrithm will never influence peple’s insights.
C．Trust can be affected by using AI in cnversatin.
D．Yu will regain yur vice by using AI in cnversatin.
24．Hw will a persn feel abut suspecting his partner’s using smart replies?
A．Nervus.B．Uncmfrtable.C．Excited.D．Puzzled.
7.（2023·福建漳州·统考三模）This mnth, the Internet was flded with wnderful digital art prtraits, thanks t the wrk f the latest artificial intelligence-assisted applicatin t g viral: Lensa. Users upladed their phtgraphs t the App and then—fr a small fee—it used AI t transfrm their prfile pictures int, say, a magical warrir princess versin f themselves, in n time at all.
This year has seen a breakthrugh fr AI-driven image generatrs, which are nw better than ever in quality, speed and affrdability. If that sunds great t yu, yu might nt be ne f the millins f humans whse livelihds depend n being able t exchange thse skills fr mney.
Sme artists predicted that a cmputer wuld recreate the aura f a masterpiece by Lenard da Vinci in the near future. As lng as there are enugh data fr the AI t train itself, it can cpy numerus masterpieces just in several minutes. It seems unavidable that a large number f artists wuld lse their jbs.
“I see it less as a threat and mre f an pprtunity,” the UK-based illustratr Michelle Thmpsn said, adding, “Like everything else, there will always be artists wh can use the tls better.”
These tls are nly as gd as the data sets they are trained n. Human imaginatin, n the ther hand, has n limit. Fr Dryhurst, an artist frm Germany, AI mdels “culd attempt t make a pale versin f smething we did years ag”, but that “desn’t accunt fr what we might d next”.
The kind f artificial intelligence we might imagine replacing artists—an entirely autnmus creative rbt—des nt yet exist, but it is cming. And as AI becmes mre universal, artists, illustratrs and designers will ultimately be set apart nt by if, but by hw, they use the technlgy.
25．Why des the authr mentin Lensa in Paragraph 1?
A．T recmmend the new App.B．T infrm latest news.
C．T lead in the AI tpic.D．T intrduce its new functin.
26．What is Michelle Thmpsn’s attitude twards AI?
A．Cncerned.B．Favrable.C．Unclear.D．Critical.
27．What might be a weakness f AI in creating art wrks?
A．Accuracy.B．Diversity.C．Creativity.D．Efficiency.
28．Which can be the best title fr the text?
A．Is AI cming int ur daily life?B．Can AI cpy masterpieces f great artists?
C．Shall we welcme new AI technlgy?D．Will AI replace artists in the future?
8.（2023·山东泰安·统考二模）Fr mre than 25 years, search engines have been the Internet’s frnt dr. AltaVista, the first site t allw searches f the full text f the web, was swiftly replaced by Ggle, which has dminated the field ever since. Ggle’s search engine, still the heart f its business, has made its parent, Alphabet, ne f the wrld’s mst valuable cmpanies.
But nthing lasts frever, particularly in technlgy. Just ask IBM, which nce ruled business cmputing, r Nkia, nce the leader in mbile phnes. Bth were defeated because they missed big technlgical transitins (革新). Nw tech firms are excited abut an innvatin that might bring a similar shift and a similar pprtunity. Chatbts (聊天机器人) pwered by artificial intelligence (AI) let users gather infrmatin via typed cnversatins. Leading the field is ChatGPT, made by OpenAI, a startup. By the end f January, tw mnths after its launch, ChatGPT was being used by mre than 100m peple, making it the fastest- grwing cnsumer applicatin in histry, accrding t UBS, a bank.
AI is already used behind the scenes in many prducts, but ChatGPT has put it center stage, by letting peple chat with an Al directly. ChatGPT can write essays in varius styles, explain cmplex cncepts, summarize text and answer varius questins. It can even pass legal and medical exams. And it can synthesise knwledge frm the web: fr example, listing hliday spts that match certain criteria, r suggesting menus. If asked, it can explain its reasning and prvide detail. Many things that peple use search engines fr tday, in shrt, can be dne better with chatbts.
On February 7th, Micrsft, which has invested mre than $11bn in OpenAI, revealed a new versin f Bing, its search engine, which includes ChatGPT. Satya Nadella, Micrsft’ s bss, sees this as his chance t challenge Ggle. Fr its part, Ggle has annunced Bard, its wn chatbt, as a cmpanin t its search engine. The share price f Baidu, knwn as the Ggle f China, jumped when it said it wuld release its chatbt, called Ernie, in March.
But can chatbts be trusted? Can tech firms make mney frm this? Only time will tell.
29．Why des the authr mentin IBM and Nkia in the secnd paragraph?
A．T prve his idea.
B．T shw their ppularity.
C．T intrduce them t readers.
D．T emphasize the value f them.
30．What des the underlined wrd “synthesise ” mean in Paragraph 3?
A．Spread.
B．Cmbine.
C．Stress.
D．Advance.
31．What is ChatGPT unable t d accrding t the text?
A．Cmprehend meaning.
B．Write essays.
C．Replace dctrs.
D．Chat with peple.
32．Which f the fllwing is the best title fr the text?
A．Will ChatGPT be ppular?
B．Will AI replace human beings?
C．Will Micrsft defeat Ggle?
D．Will ChatGPT eat Ggle’s lunch?
9.（2023·湖北黄冈·黄冈中学校考二模）AI is cnsidered t be transfrmative fr a wide range f industries, but there’s perhaps n ther field where it prvides mre value than healthcare. Machine-learning prgrams are nw being used in many hspitals t spt cancer and ther diseases and discver new drugs, but there’s still this general impressin that this is all dne in a small way and the impacts are still minimal. AI is already here t stay and it has already saved thusands f lives.
Researchers at Jhns Hpkins University published tw studies in July 2022 describing a machine-learning-based early detectin tl fr sepsis (败血症) that was used at five hspitals ver a tw-year perid. During this perid, the AI was able t identify nearly 10,000 sepsis cases frm patient recrds and helped dctrs ffer critical care abut tw hurs, n average, earlier than when they didn’t have access t the AI’s warning. Thanks t this system, the patients were 20% less likely t die f sepsis, ptentially saving thusands f lives acrss the U.S. if it is implemented (实施) natinwide.
Once sepsis sets in, the patient usually suffers fever, a rapid heart rate, and difficult breathing. When treating sepsis, time is f critical imprtance. Hwever, sepsis is nt always apparent, s there are naturally sme delayed diagnses. But if the cnditin is nt diagnsed in time, it can prgress int septic shck, causing a significant drp in bld pressure, rgan failure, and ther serius cnsequences. Even with treatment, in sme cases, there is nthing dctrs can d t save the patient’s life, which is why preventin is the name f the game with sepsis.
This is why the AI develped at Jhns Hpkins, knwn as the Targeted Real-time Early Warning System, is s imprtant. In the tw years the system had been nline since 2018, during which it mnitred 590,000 patients via their electrnic health recrds, the AI was able t flag nearly 10,000 cases f sepsis. Its accuracy fllwing diagnsis prved t be 38%, which might nt sund like a lt, but earlier systems culdn’t achieve mre than 12%.
33．What’s the general impressin f AI in the healthcare industries?
A．It is widely implemented t spt diseases.
B．It prvides mre value than in ther fields.
C．It has had a limited impact.
D．It has failed t save lives.
34．What did researchers at Jhns Hpkins University find abut the AI tl fr sepsis?
A．It culd update patient recrds.
B．It culd be used t figure ut hw sepsis ccurs.
C．It culd uncver the reasn fr delayed diagnses.
D．It culd be applied t sepsis detectin and timely caregiving.
35．What des paragraph 3 mainly fcus n?
A．The imprtance f sepsis preventin.
B．The difficulty f diagnsing sepsis.
C．The identificatin f septic shck.
D．The treatments fr septic shck.
36．Why des the authr present the data in the last paragraph?
A．T intrduce the dwnside f the studies.
B．T stress the effectiveness f the warning system.
C．T indicate the big number f patients with sepsis.
D．T call fr the imprvement f the tl’s accuracy.
10.（2023·湖北·统考二模）Mre cities, states and regins are cmmitting t cmprehensive climate plans t decarbnize (减少碳排放) transprtatin by 2040. The need fr actin is nw, and we need t rise t the challenge quickly. Ggle technlgy is unlcking ur ability t generate climate-related insights and impact n the glbe.
The transprtatin sectr is where glbal greenhuse gas (GHG) emissins are rising the quickest. In 2018, Ggle launched the Envirnmental Insights Explrer (EIE). Using AI, the systems analyze transprtatin trends in a city by mde， helping lcal gvernments assess their prgress in tackling GHG emissins. GHG inventry prcesses (温室气体排放清单) traditinally take mnths and multiple data surces t cllect, and are nw highly efficient, allwing gvernment staff t reduce the cst and persnnel burden f reprting.
In pursuit f helping mre cities take actin against climate change, we will make transprtatin insights available in EIE fr ver 20,000 cities and reginal gvernments by the end f the year, making it ne f the largest ever cllectins f high-quality, glbally cnsistent envirnmental data surces.
With EIE, cities have free access t Ggle’s unique mapping data and insights s they can decide n cleaner transprt plicies. As part f Ggle’s mst ambitius decade f climate actin, we’ve cmmitted t helping mre than 500 cities and lcal gvernments reduce a ttal sum f 1 billin tns f carbn emissins per year by 2030 and beynd.
As the windw cntinues t narrw n carrying ut plicies and plans t reduce emissins, we’re cllabrating with ther assciatins, cmmitted t addressing climate change. Our wrk with Cities. Climate Leadership Grup(C 40) will help us better supprt the needs f cities. Tgether we can prvide higher-quality transprtatin activity data t measure and track GHG emissins at a glbal scale, while als giving state and lcal gvernments resurces t better understand what’s wrking at a lcal level.
37．What can we learn abut EIE frm paragraph 2?
A．It takes ver gvernment staff’s wrk.
B．It predicts transprtatin trends in a city.
C．It results in the rising f GHG emissins.
D．It deals with data cllectin and analysis.
38．What is the purpse f the prject EIE?
A．T prmte Ggle’s ambitius climate actin.
B．T help cities make mre sustainable decisins.
C．T prvide envirnmental prtectin resurces.
D．T partner with 40 cuntries fr climate slutins.
39．Which f the fllwing can replace the underlined wrd “cllabrating” in the last paragraph?
A．Cperating.B．Cmprmising.
C．CmpetingD．Crrespnding.
40．What is the main idea f the passage?
A．Ggle helps calculate peple’s carbn ftprint with EIE.
B．Lcal gvernments benefit frm envirnmental data surces.
C．Technlgy des its part in the actin against climate change.
D．Technlgy can increase peple’s envirnmental cnsciusness.
试卷类型
年份
体裁
话题
新高考II 卷
2021
说明文
澳大利亚一名教授正在开发一种机器人，用于监测放牧牛的健康状况。