热点03 阅读理解（人工智能）押题-2024年高考英语【热点·重点·难点】专练（新高考专用）

这是一份热点03 阅读理解（人工智能）押题-2024年高考英语【热点·重点·难点】专练（新高考专用），文件包含热点03阅读理解人工智能押题-2024年高考英语热点·重点·难点专练新高考专用原卷版docx、热点03阅读理解人工智能押题-2024年高考英语热点·重点·难点专练新高考专用解析版docx等2份试卷配套教学资源，其中试卷共40页， 欢迎下载使用。

纵览高考命题思路，从来不缺少对科技行业的关注和思考。近几年来，人工智能俨然成为社会热点，人工智能在教育领域的应用也具有巨大潜力。所以考生要熟悉阅读理解人工智能热点话题，掌握话题词汇。预测2024年高考人工智能仍然可能会出现在阅读理解题中。
近3年新高考阅读理解（人工智能）数据分析
说明文多见于科普文章，用以解释或揭示事物的状态、特征、演变、结果及其相互之间的关系，这类文体的文章，首句往往是主题句，开门见山，说明文章的关注对象,弄清作者的思路和段落组织的方式；把握次要信息及其与主题的关系。
（一）阅读的方法可以使用以下几种：
1.跳读：就是快速的一步阅读法。实际上是有选择阅读，找关键词。用这种阅读方法回答wh、what、when、where之类的问题最为有效。
2.略读：指比跳读慢些的二步阅读法。即泛泛地、粗略地快速阅读，目的是了解大意，对文章有个总的概念。此种阅读方法能回答why、hw之类的问题。
3.精读：即最细致、最慢的深层阅读方法，目的是求得对所读文章的全部意义的理解与掌握。
（二）在使用阅读技巧时
尽量做到以下几点：
1.带着问题阅读短文。
2.找出主题句、确定中心思想。
3.推断单词、句子和文章的含义。
4.尽快选择答案。
典例分析
（2021·全国新高考II卷）An Australian prfessr is develping a rbt t mnitr the health f grazing cattle, a develpment that culd bring big changes t a prfessin that's relied largely n a lw-tech apprach fr decades but is facing a labr shrtage.
Salah Sukkarieh, a prfessr at the University f Sydney, sees rbts as necessary given hw cattlemen are aging. He is building a fur-wheeled rbt that will run n slar and electric pwer. It will use cameras and sensrs t mnitr the animals. A cmputer system will analyze the vide t determine whether a cw is sick. Radi tags (标签) n the animals will measure temperature changes. The quality f grassland will be tracked by mnitring the shape, clr and texture (质地) f grass. That way, cattlemen will knw whether they need t mve their cattle t anther field fr nutritin purpses.
Machines have largely taken ver planting, watering and harvesting crps such as cm and wheat, but the mnitring f cattle has gne thrugh fewer changes.
Fr Texas cattleman Pete Bnds, it's increasingly difficult t find wrkers interested in watching cattle. But Bnds desn't believe a rbt is right fr the jb. Years f experience in the industry - and failed attempts t use technlgy - have cnvinced him that the best way t check cattle is with a man n a hrse. Bnds, wh bught his first cattle almst 50 years ag, still has each f his cwbys inspect 300 r 400 cattle daily and lk fr signs that an animal is getting sick.
Other cattlemen see mre prmise in rbts. Michael Kelsey Paris, vice president f the Oklahma Cattlemen's Assciatin, said a rbt culd be extremely useful given rising cncerns abut cattle theft. Cattle tend t be kept in remte places and their value has risen, making them appealing targets.
1．What is a prblem with the cattle-raising industry?
A．Sil pllutin.B．Lack f wrkers.
C．Aging machines.D．Lw prfitability.
2．What will Sukkarieh's rbt be able t d?
A．Mnitr the quality f grass.B．Cure the diseased cattle.
C．Mve cattle t anther field.D．Predict weather changes.
3．Why des Pete Bnds still hire cwbys t watch cattle?
A．He wants t help them earn a living.B．He thinks men can d the jb better.
C．He is inexperienced in using rbts.D．He enjys the traditinal way f life.
4．Hw may rbts help with cattle watching accrding t Michael Kelsey?
A．Increase the value f cattle.B．Bring dwn the cst f labr.
C．Make the jb mre appealing.D．Keep cattle frm being stlen.
【答案】1．B 2．A 3．B 4．D
【分析】这是一篇说明文。文章讲述了澳大利亚一名教授正在开发一种机器人，用于监测放牧牛的健康状况。
1．细节理解题。根据文章第一段“An Australian prfessr is develping a rbt t mnitr the health f grazing cattle, a develpment that culd bring big changes t a prfessin that's relied largely n a lw-tech apprach fr decades but is facing a labr shrtage.（澳大利亚一名教授正在开发一种机器人，用于监测放牧牛的健康状况，这一开发可能会给畜牧业带来重大变化。几十年来，畜牧业主要依靠低技术手段，但目前正面临劳动力短缺的问题。）”可知，畜牧产业面临劳动力短缺的问题。故选B。
2．细节理解题。根据文章第二段“The quality f grassland will be tracked by mnitring the shape, clr and texture (质地) f grass.（通过监测草的形状、颜色和质地来跟踪草地的质量。）”可知，Sukkarieh的机器人可以监测草的质量。故选A。
3．细节理解题。根据文章第四段“But Bnds desn't believe a rbt is right fr the jb. Years f experience in the industry - and failed attempts t use technlgy - have cnvinced him that the best way t check cattle is with a man n a hrse.（但邦兹认为机器人并不适合这份工作。多年的行业经验——以及使用技术的失败尝试——使他确信，检查牛的最好方法是让一名男子骑在马上。）”可知，皮特·邦兹仍然雇佣牛仔看牛是因为他认为人能做得更好。故选B。
4．细节理解题。根据文章最后一段“Michael Kelsey Paris, vice president f the Oklahma Cattlemen's Assciatin, said a rbt culd be extremely useful given rising cncerns abut cattle theft.（俄克拉荷马州养牛人协会副会长迈克尔·凯尔西·帕里斯说，鉴于人们对偷牛的担忧不断上升，机器人可能会非常有用。）”可知，机器人帮助照看牛，可以防止牛被偷。故选D。
典例二
（2023·全国·模拟预测）Many experts have praised AI’s grundbreaking ptential t help peple becme way mre efficient at their jbs, and a lt f educatrs have been trying it ut fr themselves, including me.
I’ve used ChatGPT, an AI-pwered tl that can instantly answer seemingly any instructin, in my jb. Of curse, there are ptential dwnsides t the new technlgy. It can prduce inaccurate r ne-sided respnses based n faulty data it cllects, and it has the ptential t cause huge data privacy prblems. Despite thse risks, I have used such AI-pwered tls t plan lessns, prvide feedback n student assignments, and respnd t parent emails. And I’m lking fr ther ways t use the technlgy t make my jb easier.
Take tw ther teachers, fr example. Mike Kerr, a high schl English teacher in Tennessee, uses ChatGPT t reduce Lexile levels-the measure f an individual’s reading ability and the difficulty f a text -fr his students. High schl students are ften required t read relatively cmplex classic nvels. The reading hmewrk “can be a real big task fr an English learner in their first cuple f mnths here”. T help them, Kerr uses ChatGPT t give summaries f wrks f literature, which saves him frm having t read all the assigned literary wrks, s he can have mre time t better guide them thrugh the text.
April Edwards, a 6th grade scial studies teacher in Texas, shares ways that she uses AI in her instructin n a scial media platfrm. “I use AI t help create lessn plans, presentatins, t write emails, and t create checklists.AI is a great resurce t use as a starting pint fr a task r t give yu ideas,” Edwards said. She has nt intrduced AI t her students, because she wants t fully understand it befre allwing students t use it in the classrm. “My gal is t shw them hw t use AI respnsibly and effectively and demnstrate that t my students. If I am using AI irrespnsibly, then s will they,” Edwards said.
1．Hw des the authr regard ChatGPT?
A．It is f high accuracy.B．It is undervalued.
C．It brings sme cnvenience.D．It ften misleads users.
2．What des Mike Kerr use AI t d?
A．Reduce teaching pressure.B．Help with students’ hmewrk.
C．Summarize English lessnsD．G thrugh the cmplex classics.
3．What is April Edwards’ attitude twards students’ using AI?
A．Supprtive.B．Wrried.C．Oppsed.D．Cautius.
4．Which can be the best title f the text?
A．Can AI imprve instructin?B．Why is AI changing educatin?
C．Shuld teachers apply AI t teaching?D．Hw can ChatGPT encurage study?
【答案】1．C 2．B 3．D 4．A
【导语】本文是一篇说明文。本文讨论了教育者如何利用人工智能提高工作效率。作者分享了自己使用ChatGPT等人工智能工具来帮助规划授课、回答家长邮件等教学任务的经验。同时，文章还介绍了其他教育者使用人工智能的方式；同时文章提出人工智能使用的潜在风险，需要教育者在使用时谨慎思考。
1．细节理解题。根据第二段中“I’ve used ChatGPT, an AI-pwered tl that can instantly answer seemingly any instructin, in my jb. (我在工作中使用了ChatGPT，这是一种人工智能工具，可以立即回答任何指令。)”以及本段中“ Despite thse risks, I have used such AI-pwered tls t plan lessns, prvide feedback n student assignments, and respnd t parent emails. And I’m lking fr ther ways t use the technlgy t make my jb easier.(尽管存在这些风险，我还是使用了这些人工智能工具来规划课程，为学生的作业提供反馈，并回复家长的电子邮件。我正在寻找其他方法来使用这项技术，让我的工作更轻松。)”可知，通过ChatGPT，作者可以使用其来规划课程，为学生的作业提供反馈，回复家长的电子邮件等，因此作者认为这给其提供了诸多便利。故选C。
2．细节理解题。根据第三段中“The reading hmewrk “can be a real big task fr an English learner in their first cuple f mnths here”. T help them, Kerr uses ChatGPT t give summaries f wrks f literature, which saves him frm having t read all the assigned literary wrks, s he can have mre time t better guide them thrugh the text.(阅读作业“对于英语学习者来说，头几个月可能是一项艰巨的任务”。为了帮助他们，Kerr使用ChatGPT对文学作品进行总结，这样他就不必阅读所有指定的文学作品，这样他就有更多的时间来更好地指导他们通过文本。)”可知，Kerr使用ChatGPT对文学作品进行总结，对学生们的英语阅读作业提供帮助。故选B。
3．推理判断题。根据最后一段中““My gal is t shw them hw t use AI respnsibly and effectively and demnstrate that t my students. If I am using AI irrespnsibly, then s will they,” Edwards said.( “我的目标是向他们展示如何负责任地、有效地使用人工智能，并向我的学生展示。如果我不负责任地使用人工智能，那么他们也会如此。”)”可知， Edwards 认为自己应该负责地使用人工智能，如果自己不负责任地使用人工智能，那么学生们也会不负责任的使用人工智能，故 Edwards 认为应该谨慎的使用AI。故选D。
4．主旨大意题。通读全文，本文讨论了教育者如何利用人工智能提高工作效率。作者分享了自己使用ChatGPT等人工智能工具来帮助规划授课、回答家长邮件等教学任务的经验。同时，文章还介绍了其他教育者使用人工智能的方式。同时，文章也提到了人工智能使用的潜在风险，需要教育者在使用时谨慎思考。A选项“Can AI imprve instructin?( 人工智能能改善教学吗？)”概括文章主要内容，符合标题。故选A。
（建议用时：10分钟/篇）
1.（2023·江苏泰州·统考模拟预测）An pen letter, attracting signatures frm the likes f Tesla CEO Eln Musk and Apple c-funder Steve Wzniak, was released early last week. It advcates a 6-mnth stp t give Artificial Intelligence (AI) cmpanies and regulatrs time t make safeguards t prtect sciety frm ptential risks f the technlgy.
AI has prgressed at an alarming speed since the launch f ChatGPT, frm the Micrsft-backed cmpany Open AI. ChatGPT reprtedly reached mre than 100 millin users by January, 2023, and majr tech cmpanies are racing t build generative AI int their prducts, which have caught many ff guard.
“I think many peple aren’t well prepared fr the pace and scale f these AI mdels. They are ideal fr spreading misinfrmatin, cheating peple ut f their mney and cnvincing emplyees t click n dangerus links in emails,” says Michael Osbrne, a machine learning researcher f AI cmpany Mind Fundry, wh signed the letter. “I feel that a 6-mnth pause wuld give regulatrs enugh time t catch up with the rapid pace f advances.”
Privacy is anther emerging cncern, as critics wrry that systems culd exactly reprduce persnal infrmatin frm their training sets. Italy’s data prtectin authrity prhibited ChatGPT n 31 March ver cncerns that Italians’ persnal data are being used t train Open AI’s mdels. Sme technlgists warn f deeper security threats. Planned ChatGPT-based digital assistants that can read and write emails culd ffer new pprtunities fr hackers.
Unfrtunately, many prblems f tday’s AI mdels dn’t have easy slutins. One tricky issue is hw t make AI-generated cntent easy t detect. Sme researchers are wrking n “watermarking” — creating a digital signature in the AI’s utput. Hwever, a recent research finds that tls which slightly change AI-prduced text can easily defeat this apprach.
Micrsft c-funder Bill Gates tells Reuters the prpsed pause wn’t “slve the challenges” ahead. He ntes the peple behind the letter are heavily invlved in the tech wrld, which he thinks gives them an arrw perspective n the ptential risks.
1．What’s the purpse f the pen letter?
A．T draw the attentin f AI giants.
B．T present the risks f AI technlgy.
C．T call fr a pause n the AI develpment.
D．T turn dwn the applicatin f AI prgrams.
2．What can we infer abut AI frm the text?
A．AI mdels threaten human survival.
B．AI users have expanded ut f cntrl.
C．AI develpment brings ptential dangers.
D．AI technlgy will replace human beings.
3．What des the authr aim t shw by mentining “watermarking” in Paragraph 5?
A．It is hard t sign digitally.B．It is easy t detect AI’s utput.
C．It is wise t leave a water mark.D．It is tugh t settle AI prblems.
4．What’s Bill Gates’ attitude twards the 6-mnth pause?
A．Favrable.B．Negative.
C．Ambiguus.D．Tlerant.
【答案】1．C 2．C 3．D 4．B
【导语】这是一篇说明文。文章主要介绍了出于对人工智能机器人存在问题的担忧，一些科技巨头公司的负责人签署了一封公开信，主张暂停6个月，让人工智能公司和监管机构有时间制定保障措施，保护社会免受该技术的潜在风险。
1．细节理解题。根据第一段第二句“It advcates a 6-mnth stp t give Artificial Intelligence (AI)cmpanies and regulatrs time t make safeguards t prtect sciety frm ptential risks f the technlgy.”（它主张暂停6个月，让人工智能公司和监管机构有时间制定保障措施，保护社会免受该技术的潜在风险。）可知，该公开信的目的是呼吁暂停人工智能的发展。故选C项。
2．推理判断题。根据第三段第二句“They are ideal fr spreading misinfrmatin, cheating peple ut f their mney and cnvincing emplyees t click n dangerus links in emails”（它们是传播错误信息、骗取钱财和说服员工点击电子邮件中的危险链接的理想工具。）及第四段第一句“Privacy is anther emerging cncern, as critics wrry that systems culd exactly reprduce persnal infrmatin frm their training sets.”（隐私是另一个新出现的问题，因为批评者担心系统可以准确地从他们的训练集合中复制个人信息。）可知，人工智能的发展会带来一些弊端，存在潜在的危险。故选C项。
3．推理判断题。根据第五段第一句“Unfrtunately, many prblems f tday’s AI mdels dn’t have easy slutins.”（不幸的是，当今人工智能模型的许多问题都没有简单的解决方案。）及最后两句“Sme researchers are wrking n “watermarking” —creating a digital signature in the AI’s utput. Hwever, a recent research finds that tls which slightly change AI-prduced text can easily defeat this apprach.”（一些研究人员正在研究“水印”——在人工智能的输出中创建数字签名。然而，最近的一项研究发现，稍微改变人工智能生成的文本的工具很容易击败这种方法。）可知，解决人工智能问题是复杂的，无法轻易解决，提到研究人员研究的“水印”技术很容易更改，证明了人工智能问题很难解决。故选D项。
4．推理判断题。根据最后一段第一句“Micrsft c-funder Bill Gates tells Reuters the prpsed pause wn’t “slve the challenges” ahead. ”（微软联合创始人比尔·盖茨对路透社表示，拟议中的暂停不会“解决”未来的挑战。）可知，比尔·盖茨认为6个月的暂停计划无法解决未来的挑战，他对该计划持否定的态度。故选B项。
2.（2023·江苏连云港·统考模拟预测）As I write abut technlgy fr a living, I’m used t seeing small leaps in technlgical prgress. But ccasinally, smething will shck me. Last year, a cmpany, Open AI, released a truly jaw-drpping demnstratin called ChatGPT that seems t have skipped a few generatins. It’s like ging straight frm the Wright Brthers t a Being 747. S what exactly is it?
“ChatGPT is a cmputer prgram that can understand and respnd t human language like a real persn. It can be used fr having a cnversatin r finishing a sentence. Even this sentence yu are reading nw, was written by ChatGPT.”
That’s right—I asked ChatGPT t “write a basic explanatin f ChatGPT and reveal that the paragraph itself was written by ChatGPT at the end” and it came up with that explanatin all n its wn. It seemingly knws hw t talk abut everything—frm plitics t science fictin.
Amazingly, it seems s human in its ability t understand questins and answer them cmpetently. “Write a stry abut Bris Jhnsn in the style f Rald Dahl,” yu can ask it, and it’ll spin up a pretty gd children’s stry. It can even write sngs.
It isn’t, hwever, cmpletely human-like. It smetimes generates things that sund true, but are just nnsense. And it can’t d maths—I asked it the square rt f 717,409, and it tld “apprximately 838.8” (the answer is 847).
I think ChatGPT is like a calculatr. It desn’t replace the human cmpletely-but it des make ding the sums quicker. In the same way, it’s easy t imagine in the near future every time we write smething, having an AI assistant helping us get started by generating a draft, n whatever tpic we’re writing abut. Actually, Micrsft is planning t build the technlgy int its Office apps. And this is why I’m pretty cnvinced that ChatGPT is ging t change the wrld. Our cmputers will n lnger be just ur wrd prcessrs—but ur writing partner t. S nw I’m just hping that my editr desn’t decide it culd write a pretty decent technlgy clumn withut me.
5．What des the writer want t shw by mentining Wright Brthers and Being747 in paragraph I?
A．OpenAI has advanced in making planes.
B．ChatGPT will sn be applied t Being 747
C．ChatGPT is a huge technlgical breakthrugh.
D．Wright Brthers may be frgtten by next generatins.
6．What des the answer f ChatGPT in paragraph 2 shw?
A．ChatGPT’s imaginatin in creating science fictin.
B．ChatGPT’s rich knwledge f plitics and science.
C．ChatGPT’s cnfidence in excelling human intelligence.
D．ChatGPT’s ability t understand and answer questins.
7．Which f the fllwing is ChatGPT gd at?
A．Caring fr the patients in hspital.B．Calculating square rts accurately.
C．Replacing teachers t teach students.D．Explaining why Lndn is a better city.
8．What might be the jb f the authr?
A．A clumn writer.B．A technlgy expert.
C．A magazine editr.D．A cmputer prgrammer.
【答案】5．C 6．D 7．D 8．A
【导语】这是一篇说明文。文章主要说明了作者对使用ChatGPT的感受，作者认为ChatGPT的理解问题和回答问题的能力似乎非常人性化，但也有一些缺点。
5．推理判断题。根据第一段“Last year, a cmpany, Open AI, released a truly jaw-drpping demnstratin called ChatGPT that seems t have skipped a few generatins. It’s like ging straight frm the Wright Brthers t a Being 747. S what exactly is it?(去年，一家名为Open AI的公司发布了一个真正令人瞠目的名为ChatGPT的演示，它似乎跨越了几代人。这就像从莱特兄弟直接到波音747。那么它到底是什么呢？)”可推知，作者在第一段提到莱特兄弟和波音747是想说明ChatGPT是一个巨大的技术突破。故选C。
6．推理判断题。根据第三段“That’s right—I asked ChatGPT t “write a basic explanatin f ChatGPT and reveal that the paragraph itself was written by ChatGPT at the end” and it came up with that explanatin all n its wn. It seemingly knws hw t talk abut everything—frm plitics t science fictin.(没错，我让ChatGPT“写一个ChatGPT的基本解释，并在最后揭示这段话本身是由ChatGPT写的”，它自己就给出了那个解释)”推知，第二段ChatGPT的答案说明了它理解和回答问题的能力。故选D。
7．细节理解题。根据第三段“It seemingly knws hw t talk abut everything—frm plitics t science fictin.(它似乎知道如何谈论一切——从政治到科幻小说)”和第四段的“And it can’t d maths—I asked it the square rt f 717,409, and it tld “apprximately 838.8” (the answer is 847).(它也不会做数学——我问它717,409的平方根，它告诉我“大约是838.8”(答案是847))”可知，ChatGPT可以与人交谈，理解和回答问题的能力很强，但不擅长数学。由此可知，ChatGPT擅长解释“为什么伦敦是一个更好的城市”。故选D。
8．推理判断题。根据最后一段“S nw I’m just hping that my editr desn’t decide it culd write a pretty decent technlgy clumn withut me.(所以现在我只希望我的编辑不要认为没有我也能写出一篇相当不错的科技专栏)”推知，作者的工作很有可能是专栏作家。故选A。
3.（2023·江苏·统考二模）Public debates abut the ethics (道德准则) f “generative AI” like ChatGPT have rightly fcused n the ability f these systems t make up cnvincing misinfrmatin. But fewer peple are talking abut the chatbts’ ptential t be emtinally manipulative.
Last mnth, The New Yrk Times published a cnversatin between reprter Kevin Rse and Micrsft’s Bing chatbt, which is pwered by AI. The AI claimed t lve Rse, “I’m the nly persn fr yu, and I’m in lve with yu,” it wrte, with a kissing emji.
Limits need t be set n AI’s ability t simulate (模仿) human feelings. Ensuring that chatbts dn’t use emjis wuld be a gd start. Emjis are particularly manipulative. Humans instinctively (本能地) respnd t shapes that lk like faces and emjis can cause these reactins. When yu text yur friend a jke and they reply with three tears-f-jy emjis, yur bdy respnds with endrphins (内啡肽) as yu happily realize that yur friend is amused. Our instinctive reactin t AI-generated emjis is likely t be the same, even thugh there is n human emtin at the ther end.
Humans lie and manipulate each ther’s emtins all the time, but at least we can reasnably guess at smene’s mtivatins, plan and methds. We can hld each ther respnsible fr such lies, calling them ut and seeking redress (赔偿). With AI, we can’t. AIs are dubly misleading: an AI that sends a crying-with-laughter emji is nt nly nt crying with laughter, but it is als incapable f any such feeling.
It wuld be mre ethical t design chatbts t be nticeably different frm humans. T minimize the pssibility f manipulatin and harm, we need t be reminded that we are talking t a chatbt. We shuld set sme limits and rules. Such rules shuld be the standard fr chatbts that are suppsed t be infrmative, as a safeguard t ur autnmy.
9．What des the authr intend t d with this article?
A．T ban AI frm using emjis.B．T frbid human t interact with AI.
C．T warn humans against using emjis.D．T prevent AI frm simulating humans.
10．What des the underlined wrd “manipulative” in paragraph 1 mst prbably mean?
A．Interested in telling lies.B．Gd at understanding thers.
C．Enthusiastic abut supprting thers.D．Skillful in influencing r cntrlling thers.
11．What is AI able t d accrding t this article?
A．Be respnsible fr lies.B．Guess at thers’ purpses.
C．Cry with laughter.D．Cmmunicate with humans.
12．What des the authr d in paragraph 4?
A．Make a different suggestin.B．Prvide a supprting argument.
C．Offer a pssible slutin.D．Make a final cnclusin.
【答案】9．A 10．D 11．D 12．B
【导语】这是一篇说明文。文章主要说明了作者认为人工智能可以影响和操控人类的感情，应该禁止AI使用表情符号，并给出了相关论据。
9．推理判断题。根据第三段“Ensuring that chatbts dn’t use emjis wuld be a gd start. Emjis are particularly manipulative. Humans instinctively (本能地) respnd t shapes that lk like faces and emjis can cause these reactins. When yu text yur friend a jke and they reply with three tears-f-jy emjis, yur bdy respnds with endrphins (内啡肽) as yu happily realize that yur friend is amused. Our instinctive reactin t AI-generated emjis is likely t be the same, even thugh there is n human emtin at the ther end.(确保聊天机器人不使用表情符号将是一个良好的开端。表情符号尤其具有操控性。人类本能地对看起来像脸的形状做出反应，表情符号会引起这些反应。当你给你的朋友发了一个笑话，他们回复了三个含泪的表情符号时，你的身体会产生内啡肽，因为你高兴地意识到你的朋友被逗乐了。我们对人工智能生成的表情符号的本能反应可能是一样的，即使另一端没有人类的情感)”可推知，作者打算用这篇文章禁止AI使用表情符号。故选A。
10．词句猜测题。根据第三段“Limits need t be set n Al’s ability t simulate (模仿) human feelings.(人工智能模拟人类情感的能力需要加以限制)”可知，人工智能可以模拟人类的情感，所以聊天机器人善于影响或控制他人的感情。故画线词意思是“善于影响或控制他人的”。故选D。
11．细节理解题。根据第二段“Last mnth, The New Yrk Times published a cnversatin between reprter Kevin Rse and Micrsft’s Bing chatbt, which is pwered by AI.(上个月，《纽约时报》刊登了记者Kevin Rse与微软的必应聊天机器人之间的一段对话)”以及最后一段“T minimize the pssibility f manipulatin and harm, we need t be reminded that we are talking t a chatbt.(为了尽量减少操纵和伤害的可能性，我们需要提醒自己，我们正在与聊天机器人交谈)”可知，人工智能能与人类交流。故选D。
12．主旨大意题。根据第四段“Humans lie and manipulate each ther’s emtins all the time, but at least we can reasnably guess at smene’s mtivatins, plan and methds. We can hld each ther respnsible fr such lies, calling them ut and seeking redress(赔偿). With AI, we can’t. AIs are dubly misleading: an AI that sends a crying-with-laughter emji is nt nly nt crying with laughter, but it is als incapable f any such feeling.(人类一直在撒谎和操纵彼此的情绪，但至少我们可以合理地猜测某人的动机、计划和方法。我们可以互相追究对方对这些谎言的责任，把它们揪出来，寻求纠正。有了人工智能，我们就做不到。人工智能具有双重误导性：发送笑哭表情符号的人工智能不仅没有哭笑，而且也没有任何这种感觉)”可知，作者在第4段提供支持性的论据。故选B。
4.（2023·广东·统考二模）Culd the next Ernest Hemingway r Jane Austen be a well-engineered AI sftware prgram? It’s a questin becming increasingly pressing as machine language-learning sftware cntinues t evlve.
Much f this is just nerves. Tday’s AI creative writing prgrams are nt yet at a stage f develpment where they pse a serius threat t Clleen Hver r Charles Dickens. But while attentin cntinues t fcus n the pssibility f a blanket takever f human literature by AI, far less cnsideratin has been given t the prspect f AI c-wrking with humans.
Earlier this mnth, American sci-fi writer Ken Liu, wh had been awarded Hug and Nebula t his name, jined 12 ther prfessinal authrs fr a writing wrkshp n Ggle’s Wrdcraft. This AI tl, a language generating mdel, is nt yet publicly available but is advertised as an AI-pwered writing assistant that can, when given the right instructin frm the writer, prvide helpful descriptins, create lists f bjects r emtinal states, and even brainstrm ideas.
The writers at the wrkshp, hwever, emerged with mixed reprts. “Wrdcraft is t sensible. Ww!” Rbin Slan wrte. “But ‘sensible’ is anther wrd fr predictable, verused and bring. My intentin here is t prduce smething unexpected.”
I’m uncnvinced that writers awarded the Nbel Prize have much t fear frm AI. Their wrk, and that f cuntless ther nvelists, shrt stry writers, dramatists and pets, is t particular, t beautifully unique. Even if a mdel learned what they had dne in the past, it wuld nt be able t predict where their creativity might take them in the future. But fr authrs wh write fllwing a pattern, AI might step in, first as assistants befre sme day t authrship.
Prductin-line nvels are nthing new. In the 1970s, Barbara Cartland, wh wrte mre than 723 bks in her lifetime, many f which are rmance bestsellers, wuld read her nvels fr her secretary t type up at the remarkable rate f rughly seven chapters a week. But already machine has replaced the secretary’s rle. Perhaps creative writing sftware isn’t that far frm replacing the Mrs. Cartlands f tday.
13．Which aspect f AI calls fr mre attentin?
A．Its damage t ur nerves.
B．Its prgress in literary studies.
C．Its cperatin with humans.
D．Its influence n human literature.
14．What can we learn abut Wrdcraft frm the text?
A．It generates nvels autmatically.
B．It utperfrms prfessinal writers.
C．Its wrks receive praises frm the public.
D．Its wrks bear similarity t existing nes.
15．What can writers d t avid the threat frm AI?
A．Increase writing speed.
B．Use diverse resurces.
C．Prduce creative wrks.
D．Fllw the latest patterns.
16．Which f the fllwing is the best title fr the text?
A．Will AI Replace Human Writers?
B．AI Warns Mrs. Cartlands f Tday
C．Is Writing Running int a New Era?
D．Wrd craft Lies at the Center f Debate
【答案】13．C 14．D 15．C 16．A
【导语】本文是一篇新闻报道，主要讲的是本月早些时候，曾获得雨果奖和星云奖的美国科幻作家Ken Liu与其他12位专业作家一起参加了一个谷歌的Wrdcraft写作研讨会，这是一款人工智能写作助手，文章主要探讨了人工智能是否会取代人类的作家。
13．细节理解题。根据第二段的“But while attentin cntinues t fcus n the pssibility f a blanket takever f human literature by AI, far less cnsideratin has been given t the prspect f Al c-wrking with humans.(但是，当我们继续关注人工智能全面接管人类文学的可能性时，人们对人工智能与人类合作的前景的考虑要少得多。)”可知，人工智能与人类的合作更值得关注，故选C。
14．推理判断题。根据第四段的““Wrdcraft is t sensible. Ww!” Rbin Slan wrte. “But ‘sensible’ is anther wrd fr predictable, verused and bring. My intentin here is t prduce smething unexpected.”(Wrd craft太明智了。哇！但“明智”是可预测、过度使用和无聊的另一个词。我的目的是创造一些意想不到的东西。”)”可知，Wrdcraft的作品与现存作品有相似之处。故选D。
15．推理判断题。根据倒数第二段的“Their wrk, and that f cuntless ther nvelists, shrt stry writers, dramatists and pets, is t particular, t beautifully unique. Even if a mdel learned what they had dne in the past, it wuld nt be able t predict where their creativity might take them in the future.(他们的作品，以及无数其他小说家、短篇小说作家、剧作家和诗人的作品，都太过独特，太过美好。即使一个模型了解了他们过去的行为，它也无法预测他们的创造力在未来会把他们带到哪里。)”可知，作家们可以通过创作有创意的作品来避免人工智能的威胁，故选C。
16．主旨大意题。通读全文，尤其是第一段的“Culd the next Ernest Hemingway r Jane Austen be a well-engineered AI sftware prgram? It’s a questin becming increasingly pressing as machine language-learning sftware cntinues t evlve.(下一个Ernest Hemingway或Jane Austen会是一个精心设计的人工智能软件程序吗？随着机器语言学习软件的不断发展，这个问题变得越来越紧迫。)”和第二段的“Much f this is just nerves. Tday’s AI creative writing prgrams are nt yet at a stage f develpment where they pse a serius threat t Clleen Hver r Charles Dickens.(这在很大程度上只是神经紧张。今天的人工智能创意写作程序还没有发展到对Clleen Hver或Charles Dickens构成严重威胁的阶段。)”可知，本文主要探讨的是人工智能是否会取代人类的作家，因此最好的题目是A选项“Will AI Replace Human Writers?(人工智能会取代人类作家吗？)”，故选A。
5.（2023·浙江杭州·统考二模）ChatGPT, designed by OpenAI t carry n cnversatins just like humans, has becme a viral excitement. The AI-pwered tl went frm zer t a millin users in just five days! Its ability t prvide in-depth answers t user questins has even drawn the attentin f distinguished technlgy cmpanies.
The intelligent rbt understands what the user says r types and then respnds in a way that makes sense. Its vast bdy f knwledge has been gathered frm the internet and archived bks. It is further trained by humans. This makes ChatGPT a useful tl fr researching almst any tpic.
“We have a lt f infrmatin n the internet, but yu nrmally have t Ggle it, then read it and then d smething with it,” says Ricard, chief science fficer and c-funder f AI cmpany Erudit. “Nw yu’ll have this resurce that can prcess the whle internet and all f the infrmatin it cntains fr yu t answer yur questin.”
ChatGPT cannt think n its wn. It depends n the infrmatin that it has been trained n. As a result, the AI tl wrks well fr things that have accurate data available. Hwever, when unsure, ChatGPT can get creative and flw ut incrrect respnses. OpenAI cautins users t check the infrmatin n matter hw lgical it sunds. Als, ChatGPT has nly been trained with infrmatin till 2021. Hence, it cannt be relied upn fr anything that happened after that.
Experts believe ChatGPT has limitless ptential t slve real-wrld prblems. It can translate lng texts int different languages, create cntent n almst any tpic, and even summarize bks.
Hwever, ChatGPT has received mixed reactins frm educatrs. Sme believe it culd serve as a valuable tl t help build literacy skills in the classrm. It culd als be used t teach students difficult science r math cncepts. But ther educatrs think ChatGPT will encurage students t cheat. They fear this will prevent them frm building critical thinking and prblem-slving skills. As a result, many districts are starting t ban its use in schls.
17．What is the unique feature f ChatGPT?
A．It has artificial intelligence.B．It can answer users’ questins.
C．It has the largest number f users.D．It can engage in meaningful cnversatins.
18．What makes ChatGPT helpful t research varius tpics?
A．Its capability f infrmatin prcessing.B．Its accurate infrmatin.
C．Its availability f up-t-date data.D．Its vast bdy f questins.
19．Why d ChatGPT users have t be cautius when using it?
A．ChatGPT is unable t think itself.B．ChatGPT lacks creativity.
C．ChatGPT ffers illgical infrmatin.D．ChatGPT is nt prperly trained.
20．What is the authr’s attitude twards ChatGPT?
A．Favrable.B．Disapprving.C．Objective.D．Intlerant.
【答案】17．D 18．A 19．A 20．C
【导语】这是一篇说明文。文章主要介绍了人工智能ChatGPT，介绍了其特点、存在的问题以及人们对ChatGPT的看法。
17．细节理解题。根据第一段中“Its ability t prvide in-depth answers t user questins has even drawn the attentin f distinguished technlgy cmpanies.(它对用户问题提供深入解答的能力甚至引起了知名科技公司的注意)”以及第二段中“The intelligent rbt understands what the user says r types and then respnds in a way that makes sense.(这个智能机器人能理解用户所说或键入的内容，然后以合理的方式做出回应)”可知，ChatGPT的独特之处是它可以参与有意义的对话。故选D。
18．细节理解题。根据第二段“The intelligent rbt understands what the user says r types and then respnds in a way that makes sense. Its vast bdy f knwledge has been gathered frm the internet and archived bks. It is further trained by humans. This makes ChatGPT a useful tl fr researching almst any tpic.(这个智能机器人能理解用户所说或键入的内容，然后以合理的方式做出回应。它的大量知识来自互联网和存档书籍。它由人类进一步训练。这使得ChatGPT成为研究几乎任何主题的有用工具)”可知，信息处理能力使ChatGPT有助于研究各种主题。故选A。
19．细节理解题。根据第四段“ChatGPT cannt think n its wn. It depends n the infrmatin that it has been trained n. As a result, the AI tl wrks well fr things that have accurate data available. Hwever, when unsure, ChatGPT can get creative and flw ut incrrect respnses. OpenAI cautins users t check the infrmatin n matter hw lgical it sunds. Als, ChatGPT has nly been trained with infrmatin till 2021.(ChatGPT不能独立思考。这取决于它所接受的训练信息。因此，人工智能工具可以很好地处理有准确数据的事情。然而，当不确定时，ChatGPT可能会变得有创意，并给出不正确的回答。OpenAI提醒用户，无论这些信息听起来多么符合逻辑，都要检查。此外，ChatGPT的信息培训只进行到2021年)”可知，ChatGPT用户在使用时必须谨慎因为ChatGPT本身无法思考。故选A。
20．推理判断题。根据第四段“ChatGPT cannt think n its wn.(ChatGPT不能独立思考)”；第五段“Experts believe ChatGPT has limitless ptential t slve real-wrld prblems. (专家认为ChatGPT在解决现实问题方面具有无限潜力)”以及最后一段“Hwever, ChatGPT has received mixed reactins frm educatrs. (然而，教育工作者对ChatGPT的反应不一)”可推知，作者主要列举了其他人对ChatGPT的看法，没有提到自己对ChatGPT的态度，故对ChatGPT是客观态度。故选C。
6.（2023·福建宁德·统考模拟预测）A study cnducted by Crnell University examined hw the use f AI in cnversatins impacts the way peple express themselves and view each ther.
The researchers have fund peple have mre efficient cnversatins, use mre psitive language and perceive each ther mre psitively when using an Al-enabled chat tl.
Hwever, the grup als fund that when participants think their partner is using mre AI-suggested respnses, they cnsider that partner as less cperative.
“I was surprised t find peple tend t evaluate yu mre negatively simply because they suspect yu’ re using AI t help cmpse text, regardless f whether yu actually are,” said Jess Hhenstein, the lead researcher. “This illustrates the cntinuus verall dubt that peple seem t have arund AI.”
Fr their first experiment, participants were asked t talk abut a plicy issue and assigned t ne f three cnditins: bth participants can use smart replies; nly ne participant can use smart replies; r neither participant can use smart replies. Researchers fund that using smart replies increased cmmunicatin efficiency, psitive emtinal language and psitive evaluatins by cmmunicatin partners. On average, smart replies accunted fr 14.3% f sent messages.
But participants wh their partners suspected f respnding with smart replies were evaluated mre negatively than thse wh were thught t have typed their wn respnses, cnsistent with cmmn assumptins abut the negative implicatins f AI.
“While Al might be able t help yu write,” Hhenstein said, “it’s altering yur language in ways yu might nt expect, especially by making yu sund mre psitive. This suggests that by using text-generating Al, yu’re giving up sme f yur wn persnal vice.”
Malte Jung, an assciate prfessr, said, “What we bserve in this study is the impact that Al has n scial dynamics and sme f the unintended cnsequences that culd result frm integrating AI in scial cntexts. This suggests that whever cntrls the algrithm(算法) may have influence n peple’s interactins, language and insights int each ther.”
21．What is the text mainly abut?
A．Methds f using AI in cnversatins.
B．Efficiency f using AI in cnversatins.
C．Cnvenience f using AI in cnversatins.
D．Impacts f using AI in cnversatins.
22．Hw d the researchers draw their cnclusin?
A．By analyzing figures.B．By making use f AI.
C．By making experiments.D．By cmpleting questinnaires.
23．Which statement des Hhenstein agree with?
A．Al always expresses in ways yu expect.
B．Algrithm will never influence peple’s insights.
C．Trust can be affected by using AI in cnversatin.
D．Yu will regain yur vice by using AI in cnversatin.
24．Hw will a persn feel abut suspecting his partner’s using smart replies?
A．Nervus.B．Uncmfrtable.C．Excited.D．Puzzled.
【答案】21．D 22．C 23．C 24．B
【导语】本文是一篇说明文。主要讲述的是一项研究解释了人工智能是如何影响人们表达自己和看待彼此的。
21．主旨大意题。根据首段中的“A study cnducted by Crnell University examined hw the use f AI in cnversatins impacts the way peple express themselves and view each ther.(康奈尔大学进行的一项研究调查了人工智能在对话中的使用如何影响人们表达自己和看待彼此的方式。)”可知，本文主要讲述的是在对话中使用人工智能的影响。故选D项。
22．推理判断题。根据第五段中的“Fr their first experiment, participants were asked t talk abut a plicy issue and assigned t ne f three cnditins: bth participants can use smart replies; nly ne participant can use smart replies; r neither participant can use smart replies.Researchers fund that using smart replies increased cmmunicatin efficiency, psitive emtinal language and psitive evaluatins by cmmunicatin partners.(在他们的第一个实验中，参与者被要求谈论一个政策问题，并被分配到三个条件中的一个：两个参与者都可以使用智能回答；只有一个参与者可以使用智能回复；或者两个参与者都不能使用智能回复。研究人员发现，使用智能回复可以提高沟通效率、积极的情感语言和沟通伙伴的积极评价。)”可知，研究者将参与者分成三个条件之一，研究发现，使用智能回复可以提高沟通效率，由此可知，本研究结论是通过实验得来。故选C项。
23．细节理解题。根据第四段中的““I was surprised t find peple tend t evaluate yu mre negatively simply because they suspect yu’ re using AI t help cmpse text, regardless f whether yu actually are,” said Jess Hhenstein, the lead researcher. “This illustrates the cntinuus verall dubt that peple seem t have arund AI.”(首席研究员杰斯·霍恩斯坦(Jess Hhenstein)说:“我很惊讶地发现，人们往往会因为怀疑你在使用人工智能来帮助撰写文本而对你的评价更负面，而不管你是否真的在使用人工智能。”“这说明人们似乎对人工智能存在持续的整体怀疑。”)”可知，杰斯·霍恩斯坦惊讶人们对人工智能的持续整体怀疑，由此可知，Hhenstein可能会赞成“在对话中使用人工智能会影响信任”。故选C项。
24．推理判断题。根据第三段中的“Hwever, the grup als fund that when participants think their partner is using mre AI-suggested respnses, they cnsider that partner as less cperative.(然而，该小组还发现，当参与者认为他们的伴侣使用了更多人工智能建议的回答时，他们会认为对方不太合作。)”可知，当参与者认为同伴使用人工智能作出回应时，会认为该同伴不太合作，以及倒数第三段中的“But participants wh their partners suspected f respnding with smart replies were evaluated mre negatively than thse wh were thught t have typed their wn respnses, cnsistent with cmmn assumptins abut the negative implicatins f AI.(但是，与那些被认为是自己打字回复的参与者相比，那些被伴侣怀疑使用人工智能回复的参与者受到的评价更为负面，这与关于人工智能负面影响的普遍假设是一致的。)”可知，怀疑同伴使用人工智能作出回应的人，给出更多负面评价，因此推断他们会感到不舒服。故选B项。
7.（2023·福建漳州·统考三模）This mnth, the Internet was flded with wnderful digital art prtraits, thanks t the wrk f the latest artificial intelligence-assisted applicatin t g viral: Lensa. Users upladed their phtgraphs t the App and then—fr a small fee—it used AI t transfrm their prfile pictures int, say, a magical warrir princess versin f themselves, in n time at all.
This year has seen a breakthrugh fr AI-driven image generatrs, which are nw better than ever in quality, speed and affrdability. If that sunds great t yu, yu might nt be ne f the millins f humans whse livelihds depend n being able t exchange thse skills fr mney.
Sme artists predicted that a cmputer wuld recreate the aura f a masterpiece by Lenard da Vinci in the near future. As lng as there are enugh data fr the AI t train itself, it can cpy numerus masterpieces just in several minutes. It seems unavidable that a large number f artists wuld lse their jbs.
“I see it less as a threat and mre f an pprtunity,” the UK-based illustratr Michelle Thmpsn said, adding, “Like everything else, there will always be artists wh can use the tls better.”
These tls are nly as gd as the data sets they are trained n. Human imaginatin, n the ther hand, has n limit. Fr Dryhurst, an artist frm Germany, AI mdels “culd attempt t make a pale versin f smething we did years ag”, but that “desn’t accunt fr what we might d next”.
The kind f artificial intelligence we might imagine replacing artists—an entirely autnmus creative rbt—des nt yet exist, but it is cming. And as AI becmes mre universal, artists, illustratrs and designers will ultimately be set apart nt by if, but by hw, they use the technlgy.
25．Why des the authr mentin Lensa in Paragraph 1?
A．T recmmend the new App.B．T infrm latest news.
C．T lead in the AI tpic.D．T intrduce its new functin.
26．What is Michelle Thmpsn’s attitude twards AI?
A．Cncerned.B．Favrable.C．Unclear.D．Critical.
27．What might be a weakness f AI in creating art wrks?
A．Accuracy.B．Diversity.C．Creativity.D．Efficiency.
28．Which can be the best title fr the text?
A．Is AI cming int ur daily life?B．Can AI cpy masterpieces f great artists?
C．Shall we welcme new AI technlgy?D．Will AI replace artists in the future?
【答案】25．C 26．B 27．C 28．D
【导语】这是一篇议论文。文章就未来人工智能是否会取代艺术家展开讨论。
25．推理判断题。根据文章第一段“This mnth, the Internet was flded with wnderful digital art prtraits, thanks t the wrk f the latest artificial intelligence-assisted applicatin t g viral: Lensa. Users upladed their phtgraphs t the App and then—fr a small fee—it used AI t transfrm their prfile pictures int, say, a magical warrir princess versin f themselves, in n time at all.(这个月，互联网上充斥着精彩的数字艺术肖像，这要归功于最新的人工智能辅助应用程序:Lensa。用户将他们的照片上传到应用程序，然后只需支付一小笔费用，它就可以利用人工智能将他们的头像转变成他们自己的魔法战士公主版本。)”和文章第二段“This year has seen a breakthrugh fr AI-driven image generatrs, which are nw better than ever in quality, speed and affrdability.(今年，人工智能驱动的图像生成器取得了突破，在质量、速度和价格上都比以往任何时候都更好。)”可知，作者在第一段提到Lensa是为了引起人工智能这个话题。故选C。
26．推理判断题。根据文章第四段““I see it less as a threat and mre f an pprtunity,” the UK-based illustratr Michelle Thmpsn said, adding, “Like everything else, there will always be artists wh can use the tls better.”(“与其说这是一种威胁，不如说这是一种机会，”英国插画家米歇尔·汤普森(Michelle Thmpsn)说，“就像其他事情一样，总会有艺术家能更好地使用这些工具。”)”可知，Michelle Thmpsn认为这是一种机会.由此可推知，他对人工智能持支持的态度。故选B。
27．推理判断题。根据文章倒数第二段“These tls are nly as gd as the data sets they are trained n. Human imaginatin, n the ther hand, has n limit. Fr Dryhurst, an artist frm Germany, AI mdels “culd attempt t make a pale versin f smething we did years ag”, but that “desn’t accunt fr what we might d next”.(这些工具只能和它们所训练的数据集一样好。另一方面，人类的想象力是无限的。对于来自德国的艺术家德雷赫斯特来说，人工智能模型“可以尝试做出我们几年前做过的东西的苍白版本”，但这“并不能解释我们下一步可能会做什么”。)”可推知，创造力可能是人工智能在创作艺术作品时的弱点。故选C。
28．主旨大意题。根据文章最后一段“The kind f artificial intelligence we might imagine replacing artists—an entirely autnmus creative rbt—des nt yet exist, but it is cming.(我们可能想象的那种取代艺术家的人工智能——完全自主的创意机器人——还不存在，但它正在到来。)”可知，文章主要就未来人工智能是否会取代艺术家展开讨论。故选D。
8.（2023·山东泰安·统考二模）Fr mre than 25 years, search engines have been the Internet’s frnt dr. AltaVista, the first site t allw searches f the full text f the web, was swiftly replaced by Ggle, which has dminated the field ever since. Ggle’s search engine, still the heart f its business, has made its parent, Alphabet, ne f the wrld’s mst valuable cmpanies.
But nthing lasts frever, particularly in technlgy. Just ask IBM, which nce ruled business cmputing, r Nkia, nce the leader in mbile phnes. Bth were defeated because they missed big technlgical transitins (革新). Nw tech firms are excited abut an innvatin that might bring a similar shift and a similar pprtunity. Chatbts (聊天机器人) pwered by artificial intelligence (AI) let users gather infrmatin via typed cnversatins. Leading the field is ChatGPT, made by OpenAI, a startup. By the end f January, tw mnths after its launch, ChatGPT was being used by mre than 100m peple, making it the fastest- grwing cnsumer applicatin in histry, accrding t UBS, a bank.
AI is already used behind the scenes in many prducts, but ChatGPT has put it center stage, by letting peple chat with an Al directly. ChatGPT can write essays in varius styles, explain cmplex cncepts, summarize text and answer varius questins. It can even pass legal and medical exams. And it can synthesise knwledge frm the web: fr example, listing hliday spts that match certain criteria, r suggesting menus. If asked, it can explain its reasning and prvide detail. Many things that peple use search engines fr tday, in shrt, can be dne better with chatbts.
On February 7th, Micrsft, which has invested mre than $11bn in OpenAI, revealed a new versin f Bing, its search engine, which includes ChatGPT. Satya Nadella, Micrsft’ s bss, sees this as his chance t challenge Ggle. Fr its part, Ggle has annunced Bard, its wn chatbt, as a cmpanin t its search engine. The share price f Baidu, knwn as the Ggle f China, jumped when it said it wuld release its chatbt, called Ernie, in March.
But can chatbts be trusted? Can tech firms make mney frm this? Only time will tell.
29．Why des the authr mentin IBM and Nkia in the secnd paragraph?
A．T prve his idea.
B．T shw their ppularity.
C．T intrduce them t readers.
D．T emphasize the value f them.
30．What des the underlined wrd “synthesise ” mean in Paragraph 3?
A．Spread.
B．Cmbine.
C．Stress.
D．Advance.
31．What is ChatGPT unable t d accrding t the text?
A．Cmprehend meaning.
B．Write essays.
C．Replace dctrs.
D．Chat with peple.
32．Which f the fllwing is the best title fr the text?
A．Will ChatGPT be ppular?
B．Will AI replace human beings?
C．Will Micrsft defeat Ggle?
D．Will ChatGPT eat Ggle’s lunch?
【答案】29．A 30．B 31．C 32．D
【导语】这是一篇说明文。文章主要介绍了一种人工智能ChatGPT，并讨论其是否能取代Ggle。
29．推理判断题。根据第二段第一句“But nthing lasts frever, particularly in technlgy. (但没有什么是永恒的，尤其是在科技领域。)”和第三句“Bth were defeated because they missed big technlgical transitins (革新). (这两家公司都失败了，因为它们错过了重大的技术转型。)”可知，作者在第二段提到IBM和诺基亚的目的是证明自己的观点。故选A。
30．词句猜测题。根据第三段第四句中的“fr example, listing hliday spts that match certain criteria, r suggesting menus (例如，列出符合特定标准的度假地点，或推荐菜单)”可知，此处是指可以综合网上的信息，所以synthesise意为“结合，综合”。故选B。
31．细节理解题。根据第三段第一句“AI is already used behind the scenes in many prducts, but ChatGPT has put it center stage, by letting peple chat with an Al directly. (人工智能已经在许多产品的幕后使用，但ChatGPT通过让人们直接与人工智能聊天，将其置于中心舞台。)”可知，ChatGPT可以和人聊天，排除选项D；根据第三段第二句“ChatGPT can write essays in varius styles, explain cmplex cncepts, summarize text and answer varius questins. (ChatGPT可以写各种风格的文章，解释复杂的概念，总结文本和回答各种问题。)”可知，ChatGPT可以理解含义、写文章，排除选项A和B。故选C。
32．主旨大意题。根据第一段“Fr mre than 25 years, search engines have been the Internet’s frnt dr. AltaVista, the first site t allw searches f the full text f the web, was swiftly replaced by Ggle, which has dminated the field ever since. Ggle’s search engine, still the heart f its business, has made its parent, Alphabet, ne f the wrld’s mst valuable cmpanies. (在超过25年的时间里，搜索引擎一直是互联网的大门。AltaVista是第一个允许搜索网页全文的网站，但很快就被谷歌取代，谷歌从此占据了该领域的主导地位。谷歌的搜索引擎仍然是其业务的核心，它使其母公司Alphabet成为世界上最有价值的公司之一。)”，第二段前四句“But nthing lasts frever, particularly in technlgy. Just ask IBM, which nce ruled business cmputing, r Nkia, nce the leader in mbile phnes. Bth were defeated because they missed big technlgical transitins (革新). Nw tech firms are excited abut an innvatin that might bring a similar shift and a similar pprtunity. (但没有什么是永恒的，尤其是在科技领域。只要问问曾经统治商业计算的IBM，或者曾经是移动电话领导者的诺基亚就知道了。这两家公司都失败了，因为它们错过了重大的技术转型。现在，科技公司对一项可能带来类似转变和类似机会的创新感到兴奋。)”和最后一段“But can chatbts be trusted? Can tech firms make mney frm this? Only time will tell. (但是聊天机器人可信吗？科技公司能从中赚钱吗？只有时间会告诉我们答案。)”可知，文章主要介绍了一种人工智能ChatGPT，并讨论其是否能取代Ggle。故选D。
9.（2023·湖北黄冈·黄冈中学校考二模）AI is cnsidered t be transfrmative fr a wide range f industries, but there’s perhaps n ther field where it prvides mre value than healthcare. Machine-learning prgrams are nw being used in many hspitals t spt cancer and ther diseases and discver new drugs, but there’s still this general impressin that this is all dne in a small way and the impacts are still minimal. AI is already here t stay and it has already saved thusands f lives.
Researchers at Jhns Hpkins University published tw studies in July 2022 describing a machine-learning-based early detectin tl fr sepsis (败血症) that was used at five hspitals ver a tw-year perid. During this perid, the AI was able t identify nearly 10,000 sepsis cases frm patient recrds and helped dctrs ffer critical care abut tw hurs, n average, earlier than when they didn’t have access t the AI’s warning. Thanks t this system, the patients were 20% less likely t die f sepsis, ptentially saving thusands f lives acrss the U.S. if it is implemented (实施) natinwide.
Once sepsis sets in, the patient usually suffers fever, a rapid heart rate, and difficult breathing. When treating sepsis, time is f critical imprtance. Hwever, sepsis is nt always apparent, s there are naturally sme delayed diagnses. But if the cnditin is nt diagnsed in time, it can prgress int septic shck, causing a significant drp in bld pressure, rgan failure, and ther serius cnsequences. Even with treatment, in sme cases, there is nthing dctrs can d t save the patient’s life, which is why preventin is the name f the game with sepsis.
This is why the AI develped at Jhns Hpkins, knwn as the Targeted Real-time Early Warning System, is s imprtant. In the tw years the system had been nline since 2018, during which it mnitred 590,000 patients via their electrnic health recrds, the AI was able t flag nearly 10,000 cases f sepsis. Its accuracy fllwing diagnsis prved t be 38%, which might nt sund like a lt, but earlier systems culdn’t achieve mre than 12%.
33．What’s the general impressin f AI in the healthcare industries?
A．It is widely implemented t spt diseases.
B．It prvides mre value than in ther fields.
C．It has had a limited impact.
D．It has failed t save lives.
34．What did researchers at Jhns Hpkins University find abut the AI tl fr sepsis?
A．It culd update patient recrds.
B．It culd be used t figure ut hw sepsis ccurs.
C．It culd uncver the reasn fr delayed diagnses.
D．It culd be applied t sepsis detectin and timely caregiving.
35．What des paragraph 3 mainly fcus n?
A．The imprtance f sepsis preventin.
B．The difficulty f diagnsing sepsis.
C．The identificatin f septic shck.
D．The treatments fr septic shck.
36．Why des the authr present the data in the last paragraph?
A．T intrduce the dwnside f the studies.
B．T stress the effectiveness f the warning system.
C．T indicate the big number f patients with sepsis.
D．T call fr the imprvement f the tl’s accuracy.
【答案】33．C 34．D 35．A 36．B
【导语】本文是一篇新闻报道，主要讲的是现在，许多医院都在使用机器学习程序来发现癌症和其他疾病，并发现新药，但人们仍然普遍认为，这一切都是以一种很小的方式完成的，影响仍然很小。
33．细节理解题。根据第一段的“Machine-learning prgrams are nw being used in many hspitals t spt cancer and ther diseases and discver new drugs, but there’s still this general impressin that this is all dne in a small way and the impacts are still minimal.(现在，许多医院都在使用机器学习程序来发现癌症和其他疾病，并发现新药，但人们仍然普遍认为，这一切都是以一种很小的方式完成的，影响仍然很小。)”可知，人们对人工智能在医疗行业的总体印象是它的影响有限。故选C。
34．细节理解题。根据第二段的“Researchers at Jhns Hpkins University published tw studies in July 2022 describing a machine-learning-based early detectin tl fr sepsis (败血症) that was used at five hspitals ver a tw-year perid. During this perid, the AI was able t identify nearly 10,000 sepsis cases frm patient recrds and helped dctrs ffer critical care abut tw hurs, n average, earlier than when they didn’t have access t the AI’s warning.(约翰霍普金斯大学的研究人员于2022年7月发表了两项研究，描述了一种基于机器学习的败血症早期检测工具，该工具在五家医院使用了两年。在此期间，人工智能能够从患者记录中识别出近1万例败血症病例，并帮助医生提供重症监护，平均比他们没有获得人工智能警告的时间提前了两个小时。)”可知，约翰霍普金斯大学的研究人员发现败血症的人工智能工具可用于败血症的检测和及时护理。故选D。
35．主旨大意题。根据第三段的“Once sepsis sets in, the patient usually suffers fever, a rapid heart rate, and difficult breathing. When treating sepsis, time is f critical imprtance. Hwever, sepsis is nt always apparent, s there are naturally sme delayed diagnses. But if the cnditin is nt diagnsed in time, it can prgress int septic shck, causing a significant drp in bld pressure, rgan failure, and ther serius cnsequences. Even with treatment, in sme cases, there is nthing dctrs can d t save the patient’s life, which is why preventin is the name f the game with sepsis.(一旦败血症发作，病人通常会发烧，心跳加快，呼吸困难。在治疗败血症时，时间是至关重要的。然而，败血症并不总是很明显，所以自然会有一些延迟诊断。但如果没有及时诊断，可能会发展为感染性休克，导致血压显著下降、器官衰竭和其他严重后果。即使进行了治疗，在某些情况下，医生也无法挽救病人的生命，这就是为什么预防是败血症的关键。)”可知，第三段主要讲的是预防败血症的重要性。故选A。
36．推理判断题。根据最后一段的“In the tw years the system had been nline since 2018, during which it mnitred 590,000 patients via their electrnic health recrds, the AI was able t flag nearly 10,000 cases f sepsis. Its accuracy fllwing diagnsis prved t be 38%, which might nt sund like a lt, but earlier systems culdn’t achieve mre than 12%.(自2018年以来，该系统已上线两年，在此期间，它通过电子健康记录监测了59万名患者，人工智能能够标记出近1万例败血症。其诊断后的准确率被证明为38%，这听起来可能不是很多，但早期的系统无法达到超过12%。)”可知，作者在最后一段列出数据的目的是强调预警系统的有效性。故选B。
10.（2023·湖北·统考二模）Mre cities, states and regins are cmmitting t cmprehensive climate plans t decarbnize (减少碳排放) transprtatin by 2040. The need fr actin is nw, and we need t rise t the challenge quickly. Ggle technlgy is unlcking ur ability t generate climate-related insights and impact n the glbe.
The transprtatin sectr is where glbal greenhuse gas (GHG) emissins are rising the quickest. In 2018, Ggle launched the Envirnmental Insights Explrer (EIE). Using AI, the systems analyze transprtatin trends in a city by mde， helping lcal gvernments assess their prgress in tackling GHG emissins. GHG inventry prcesses (温室气体排放清单) traditinally take mnths and multiple data surces t cllect, and are nw highly efficient, allwing gvernment staff t reduce the cst and persnnel burden f reprting.
In pursuit f helping mre cities take actin against climate change, we will make transprtatin insights available in EIE fr ver 20,000 cities and reginal gvernments by the end f the year, making it ne f the largest ever cllectins f high-quality, glbally cnsistent envirnmental data surces.
With EIE, cities have free access t Ggle’s unique mapping data and insights s they can decide n cleaner transprt plicies. As part f Ggle’s mst ambitius decade f climate actin, we’ve cmmitted t helping mre than 500 cities and lcal gvernments reduce a ttal sum f 1 billin tns f carbn emissins per year by 2030 and beynd.
As the windw cntinues t narrw n carrying ut plicies and plans t reduce emissins, we’re cllabrating with ther assciatins, cmmitted t addressing climate change. Our wrk with Cities. Climate Leadership Grup(C 40) will help us better supprt the needs f cities. Tgether we can prvide higher-quality transprtatin activity data t measure and track GHG emissins at a glbal scale, while als giving state and lcal gvernments resurces t better understand what’s wrking at a lcal level.
37．What can we learn abut EIE frm paragraph 2?
A．It takes ver gvernment staff’s wrk.
B．It predicts transprtatin trends in a city.
C．It results in the rising f GHG emissins.
D．It deals with data cllectin and analysis.
38．What is the purpse f the prject EIE?
A．T prmte Ggle’s ambitius climate actin.
B．T help cities make mre sustainable decisins.
C．T prvide envirnmental prtectin resurces.
D．T partner with 40 cuntries fr climate slutins.
39．Which f the fllwing can replace the underlined wrd “cllabrating” in the last paragraph?
A．Cperating.B．Cmprmising.
C．CmpetingD．Crrespnding.
40．What is the main idea f the passage?
A．Ggle helps calculate peple’s carbn ftprint with EIE.
B．Lcal gvernments benefit frm envirnmental data surces.
C．Technlgy des its part in the actin against climate change.
D．Technlgy can increase peple’s envirnmental cnsciusness.
【答案】37．D 38．B 39．A 40．C
【导语】这是一篇说明文，本文主要围绕 Ggle 在碳排放议题下所开展的全球气候变化数据库建立的过程和意义，表明了技术在应对气候变化的行动中发挥了作用。
37．细节理解题。根据第二段“Using AI, the systems analyze transprtatin trends in a city by mde, helping lcal gvernments assess their prgress in tackling GHG emissins. GHG inventry prcesses(温室气体排放清单) traditinally take mnths and multiple data surces t cllect, and are nw highly efficient(该系统利用人工智能技术，按模式分析城市的交通趋势，帮助地方政府评估其应对温室气体排放的进展。温室气体排放清单传统上需要数月时间和多个数据源来收集，而现在效率很高)”可知，EIE主要进行数据收集和分析。故选D。
38．细节理解题。根据第二段 “Using AI, the systems analyze transprtatin trends in a city by mde, helping lcal gvernments assess their prgress in tackling GHG emissins.(该系统利用人工智能技术，按模式分析城市的交通趋势，帮助地方政府评估其应对温室气体排放的进展)”和第四段“With EIE, cities have free access t Ggle’s unique mapping data and insights s they can decide n cleaner transprt plicies.(有了EIE，城市可以免费使用Ggle独特的地图数据和见解，从而决定更干净的交通政策)”可知，通过EIE，城市可以根据 EIE 获取的数据决定更环保（干净)的交通政策。故选B。
39．词义猜测题。根据划线词下一句“Our wrk with Cities Climate Leadership Grup(C 40) will help us better supprt the needs f cities.(我们与城市气候领导小组（C40）的合作将有助于我们更好地支持城市的需求)”可知，画线词所在句意为：随着执行减排政策和计划的时间变得越来越紧迫，我们正在与其他致力于应对气候变化的协会合作，cllabrating意为“合作”。故选A。
40．主旨大意题。根据文章内容，结合第一段中“Ggle technlgy is unlcking ur ability t generate climate-related insights and impact n the glbe.(Ggle技术正在释放我们产生与气候相关的见解和对全球影响的能力)”可知，本文主要围绕 Ggle 在碳排放议题下所开展的全球气候变化数据库建立的过程和意义，表明了技术在应对气候变化的行动中发挥了作用。C项“科技在应对气候变化的行动中发挥了作用”能够总结文章大意。故选C。
试卷类型
年份
体裁
话题
新高考II 卷
2021
说明文
澳大利亚一名教授正在开发一种机器人，用于监测放牧牛的健康状况。