资料中包含下列文件，点击文件名可预览资料内容
还剩3页未读，
继续阅读
所属成套资源：2024届高中英语时文阅读外刊精选精练
成套系列资料，整套一键下载
专题23 乒乓外交的遗产-2024届高考英语时文阅读外刊精选精练
展开
这是一份专题23 乒乓外交的遗产-2024届高考英语时文阅读外刊精选精练，文件包含专题23乒乓外交的遗产-高中英语时文阅读外刊精选精练原卷版docx、专题23乒乓外交的遗产-高中英语时文阅读外刊精选精练解析版docx等2份试卷配套教学资源，其中试卷共15页， 欢迎下载使用。
专题23
乒乓外交的遗产
【原文·外刊阅读】
Revisiting the legacy f Ping-Png Diplmacy
（文章来源：Glbal Times）
The 45th anniversary f the establishment f diplmatic relatins between China and the US was cmmemrated with a gesture that recalled an era f unexpected thawing in China-US relatins: the exchange f table tennis teams between the University f Virginia and Peking University. This exchange, mirrring the histric "Ping-Png Diplmacy" f the early 1970s, serves as a reminder f the unique rle that sprt, particularly table tennis, has played in bridging the divide between tw f the wrld's majr pwers.
The riginal "Ping-Png Diplmacy" was an event that marked the end f a 22-year estrangement between China and the US. Histrical analysis shws that its emergence and subsequent evlutin were prmted by many individuals wh demnstrated ability, curage and decisiveness during that era. The phrase "the small ball turns the big ball - the earth" encapsulates the mnumental impact that this sprting engagement had n glbal geplitics. The simple act f table tennis players crssing brders led t a cascade f diplmatic engagements that ultimately rebted China-US relatins, an impact whse ripples are still felt tday.
Reflecting n my wn experiences as a freshman f English language study, the news f the establishment f diplmatic relatins between China and the US was a watershed mment. The arrival f American teachers n ur campus was a tangible manifestatin f this newfund penness. Since then, the depth and breadth f the peple-t-peple exchanges that have unflded are a testament t the enduring legacy f thse early interactins.
Nw, the resumptin f civil exchanges has seen Chinese schlars, businessmen and entrepreneurs gradually reengage with their American cunterparts, and will fster a nuanced understanding f the bilateral relatinship. Despite these psitive strides, the cntemprary landscape f China-US relatins is markedly different frm the past. The geplitical dynamics have evlved, and the simplicity f "Ping-Png Diplmacy" as a catalyst fr change seems almst quaint in the face f cmplex mdern challenges.
The essence f "Ping-Png Diplmacy" lies in its demnstratin f the imprtance f crss-cultural dialgue. The need fr cuntries t be understd, rather than misunderstd, is universal, and China is n exceptin. The inevitability f interactin between tw culturally and histrically distinct majr pwers underscres the necessity f a diplmatic breakthrugh, n matter hw uncnventinal. The exchanges spurred by "Ping-Png Diplmacy" accelerated the pace f glbalizatin and left an indelible mark n wrld histry and human develpment.
Tday, even as the US identifies China as a cmpetitr, there is an acknwledgment f a new kind f relatinship. One f the changes is characterized by brad and deep interpersnal interactins. Frm the inceptin f "Ping-Png Diplmacy," the China-US relatinship has transcended traditinal diplmatic and ecnmic ties t encmpass scial and familial dimensins. These layers f cnnectin are nw integral t the freign plicy f any third natin.
The term "relatinship" in the cntext f China and the US encmpasses nt nly natinal interests and strategic cnsideratins but als the exchange f ideas and cultures thrugh interpersnal cntact. The rise f China, as a significant Eastern pwer with a vast ppulatin, means that these exchanges have becme increasingly critical. The cmplexity and depth f the China-US relatinship make it a pivtal factr in shaping the trajectry f internatinal relatins in the 21st century. The current cnsensus is that cexistence between these tw great pwers is the nrm. Hwever, there is still a divergence in pinins n the mdalities f this cexistence. While cntemprary "Ping-Png Diplmacy" may nt have the same revlutinary impact as its predecessr, its symblic value remains significant. "Ping-Png Diplmacy" serves as a reminder that in the cmplex web f internatinal relatins, simple acts f cultural and sprting exchange can still fster mutual understanding and respect, because this kind f activity is the basis f peple-t-peple exchanges.
As nted by Hng Zhahui, a Chinese-American schlar wh studied the histry f "Ping-Png Diplmacy," the mst prfund lessn frm this chapter f histry is the recgnitin that peple, nt merely plicy r bjects, are the primary drivers f diplmatic relatins.
【原创·阅读理解】
1.What was the significance f the exchange f table tennis teams between the University f Virginia and Peking University n the 45th anniversary f China-US diplmatic relatins?
A. It marked the establishment f diplmatic relatins between China and the US.
B. It symblized a thaw in China-US relatins reminiscent f "Ping-Png Diplmacy."
C. It was a histric event that ended a 22-year estrangement between the tw cuntries.
D. It demnstrated the impact f mdern sprts diplmacy n glbal geplitics.
2.What was the impact f the riginal "Ping-Png Diplmacy" n glbal geplitics, accrding t the article?
A. It led t the end f a 22-year estrangement between China and the US.
B. It resulted in the emergence f many individuals with decisive abilities.
C. It accelerated the pace f glbalizatin and left a lasting mark n wrld histry.
D. It demnstrated the simplicity f sprting engagements as catalysts fr change.
3.What des the term "relatinship" in the cntext f China and the US encmpass, accrding t the article?
A. Natinal interests and strategic cnsideratins.
B. Exchange f ideas and cultures thrugh interpersnal cntact.
C. Ecnmic ties and geplitical dynamics.
D. The cmplexity f internatinal relatins in the 21st century.
【精选·名校好题】
Ⅰ
（2024·天津第四十七中联考）Nenad Sestan was wrking in his ffice ne afternn in 2019 when he heard his lab members whispering with excitement ver a micrscpe. He realized smething beynd their expectatins was happening.
The researchers, at Yale Schl f Medicine in New Haven, Cnnecticut, had fund electrical activity in brains taken frm dead pigs. With that shcking result, Sestan realized what had started as a side prject t find ways t better preserve brain tissue fr research had changed int a discvery that culd redefine ur understanding f life and death.
The excitement sn turned t cncern, when the researchers thught they saw widespread, cnsistent electrical activity which can indicate cnsciusness. Sestan brught in a neurlgist, wh determined the readut (信息读出) was actually an errr, but the pssibility had frightened them.
Sestan kept his cl and immediately did tw things: he shut dwn the experiment and cntacted the US Natinal Institutes f Health (NIH), as well as Yale biethicist (生物伦理学家). Over the next few mnths, experts discussed the ptential ethical effects, such as whether the brains culd becme cnscius and whether physicians needed t recnsider the definitin f brain death.
They submitted the wrk t the “Nature”. But befre the final paper was published: Sestan met sharp criticism frm the press. Sme even suggested the researchers were wrking n immrtality (永生), r keeping a rm full f living brains in jars. Neither he r his team wanted t discuss the results until the paper was ut, but as their inbxes filled with cncerns and anger frm animal rights activists and futurists (未来主义者), Sestan became depressed. He felt all they culd d, hwever, was t hld ff n crrecting public misunderstandings until the expert review prcess ended.
Since the paper was published in April, 2023, the team has been s busy with questins frm the media and scientists that it hasn’t perfrmed any further experiments. Sestan wants t fcus n his riginal questins and explre hw lng the brains can be maintained and whether the technlgy can preserve ther rgans.
“We want t get utside pinin befre we d anything.” Sestan says. “When yu explre uncharted area, yu have t be extremely thughtful.”
17．What happened in the lab at Yale Schl f Medicine in 2019?
A．A better methd was fund t keep brain issue.
B．Researchers discvered hw t redefine brain death.
C．Researchers achieved expected results f the experiment.
D．Brains frm dead pigs were accidentally discvered alive.
18．Why did Nenad Sestan stp the experiment?
A．He needed assistance with the final paper.
B．He discvered a majr mistake in the final result.
C．He was cncerned abut the related mral prblems.
D．He was frightened by the pssibility f failure in the future.
19．What was peple’s reactin twards Nenad Sestan’s experiment?
A．Nbdy wanted t discuss the final result in advance!
B．Sme peple supprted the research n immrtality.
C．The press was strngly ppsed t the experiment.
D．The public tk a psitive attitude twards the experiment.
20．Hw culd we best describe Wenad Sestan?
A．Respnsible and reliable.
B．Prfessinal and cautius
C．Helpful and creative.
D．Determined and inspiring.
21．What des the underlined wrd “uncharted” in the last paragraph mean?
A．Hrrible.B．Specific.C．Develped.D．Unknwn.
Ⅱ
（2024·吉林白山高一期末）Mre American businesses are starting t use artificial intelligence(AI)tls t cme up with new ideas and t deal with custmers.
Mattel is knwn fr making children’s tys. The cmpany recently used an AI image generatr (生成器) called DALL-E t cme up with ideas fr new Ht Wheels ty cars. The used vehicle seller CarMax is using ChatGPT t gather thusands f custmer cmments. The scial media service Snapchat has added a chatbt (聊天机器人) t its messaging service. And Instacart, a delivery service, nw uses ChatGPT t answer fd questins. Even the Cca-Cla cmpany plans t use AI t help create new marketing cntent. It has nt said exactly hw it plans t use the technlgy. But the mve shws that businesses are under pressure t use the tls that many f their emplyees and custmers are already trying n their wn.
Sme experts warn that businesses shuld carefully cnsider pssible harms t custmers, sciety, and their wn cmpanies befre chsing t use AI tls in the wrkplace. Chaire Leibwicz wrks at The Partnership n AI, a nnprfit grup. The grup recently released recmmendatins fr cmpanies prducing AI- generated images, audi and ther media. “I want peple t think deeply befre deplying this technlgy” Leibwicz said. “They shuld play arund. . . but we shuld als think, what purpse are these tls serving in the first place?”
While text generatrs like ChatGPT can make the prcess f writing emails and marketing dcuments faster and easier, they als appear t present misinfrmatin as fact. And image generatrs like DALL-E are trained in cpying widely available digital art and phtgraphy. This has raise (版权)cncerns frm the creatrs f thse wrks.
“It is safer t use AI tls as a ‘thught partner’ but still peple as the creatr f final prducts,” said Anna Gressel. She wrks at the law cmpany Debevise & Plimptn, which advises businesses n hw t use AI.
22．Which cmpany made creative prducts with Al tls’ help?
A．Instacart B．Matel
C．CarMax D．Snapchat
23．What can we infer frm the secnd paragraph?
A．Peple rely t much n technlgy in their daily life.
B．AI tls are widely used t help businesses grw.
C．AI tls have an effect n imprving business cnditins.
D．Custmers are mre and mre cnnected nline.
24．What des the underlined wrd “deplying” in paragraph 3 mean?
A．presenting cnfidently
B．prmting successfully
C．debating publicly
D．applying effectively
25．What can we learn frm Anna Gressel’s wrds?
A．AI tls shuld just be humans’ assistants.
B．The use f AI tls shuld be frbidden.
C．A business shuld partner with a law cmpany.
D．Cpyright cncerns are unnecessary
专题23
乒乓外交的遗产
【原文·外刊阅读】
Revisiting the legacy f Ping-Png Diplmacy
（文章来源：Glbal Times）
The 45th anniversary f the establishment f diplmatic relatins between China and the US was cmmemrated with a gesture that recalled an era f unexpected thawing in China-US relatins: the exchange f table tennis teams between the University f Virginia and Peking University. This exchange, mirrring the histric "Ping-Png Diplmacy" f the early 1970s, serves as a reminder f the unique rle that sprt, particularly table tennis, has played in bridging the divide between tw f the wrld's majr pwers.
The riginal "Ping-Png Diplmacy" was an event that marked the end f a 22-year estrangement between China and the US. Histrical analysis shws that its emergence and subsequent evlutin were prmted by many individuals wh demnstrated ability, curage and decisiveness during that era. The phrase "the small ball turns the big ball - the earth" encapsulates the mnumental impact that this sprting engagement had n glbal geplitics. The simple act f table tennis players crssing brders led t a cascade f diplmatic engagements that ultimately rebted China-US relatins, an impact whse ripples are still felt tday.
Reflecting n my wn experiences as a freshman f English language study, the news f the establishment f diplmatic relatins between China and the US was a watershed mment. The arrival f American teachers n ur campus was a tangible manifestatin f this newfund penness. Since then, the depth and breadth f the peple-t-peple exchanges that have unflded are a testament t the enduring legacy f thse early interactins.
Nw, the resumptin f civil exchanges has seen Chinese schlars, businessmen and entrepreneurs gradually reengage with their American cunterparts, and will fster a nuanced understanding f the bilateral relatinship. Despite these psitive strides, the cntemprary landscape f China-US relatins is markedly different frm the past. The geplitical dynamics have evlved, and the simplicity f "Ping-Png Diplmacy" as a catalyst fr change seems almst quaint in the face f cmplex mdern challenges.
The essence f "Ping-Png Diplmacy" lies in its demnstratin f the imprtance f crss-cultural dialgue. The need fr cuntries t be understd, rather than misunderstd, is universal, and China is n exceptin. The inevitability f interactin between tw culturally and histrically distinct majr pwers underscres the necessity f a diplmatic breakthrugh, n matter hw uncnventinal. The exchanges spurred by "Ping-Png Diplmacy" accelerated the pace f glbalizatin and left an indelible mark n wrld histry and human develpment.
Tday, even as the US identifies China as a cmpetitr, there is an acknwledgment f a new kind f relatinship. One f the changes is characterized by brad and deep interpersnal interactins. Frm the inceptin f "Ping-Png Diplmacy," the China-US relatinship has transcended traditinal diplmatic and ecnmic ties t encmpass scial and familial dimensins. These layers f cnnectin are nw integral t the freign plicy f any third natin.
The term "relatinship" in the cntext f China and the US encmpasses nt nly natinal interests and strategic cnsideratins but als the exchange f ideas and cultures thrugh interpersnal cntact. The rise f China, as a significant Eastern pwer with a vast ppulatin, means that these exchanges have becme increasingly critical. The cmplexity and depth f the China-US relatinship make it a pivtal factr in shaping the trajectry f internatinal relatins in the 21st century. The current cnsensus is that cexistence between these tw great pwers is the nrm. Hwever, there is still a divergence in pinins n the mdalities f this cexistence. While cntemprary "Ping-Png Diplmacy" may nt have the same revlutinary impact as its predecessr, its symblic value remains significant. "Ping-Png Diplmacy" serves as a reminder that in the cmplex web f internatinal relatins, simple acts f cultural and sprting exchange can still fster mutual understanding and respect, because this kind f activity is the basis f peple-t-peple exchanges.
As nted by Hng Zhahui, a Chinese-American schlar wh studied the histry f "Ping-Png Diplmacy," the mst prfund lessn frm this chapter f histry is the recgnitin that peple, nt merely plicy r bjects, are the primary drivers f diplmatic relatins.
【原创·阅读理解】
1.What was the significance f the exchange f table tennis teams between the University f Virginia and Peking University n the 45th anniversary f China-US diplmatic relatins?
A. It marked the establishment f diplmatic relatins between China and the US.
B. It symblized a thaw in China-US relatins reminiscent f "Ping-Png Diplmacy."
C. It was a histric event that ended a 22-year estrangement between the tw cuntries.
D. It demnstrated the impact f mdern sprts diplmacy n glbal geplitics.
2.What was the impact f the riginal "Ping-Png Diplmacy" n glbal geplitics, accrding t the article?
A. It led t the end f a 22-year estrangement between China and the US.
B. It resulted in the emergence f many individuals with decisive abilities.
C. It accelerated the pace f glbalizatin and left a lasting mark n wrld histry.
D. It demnstrated the simplicity f sprting engagements as catalysts fr change.
3.What des the term "relatinship" in the cntext f China and the US encmpass, accrding t the article?
A. Natinal interests and strategic cnsideratins.
B. Exchange f ideas and cultures thrugh interpersnal cntact.
C. Ecnmic ties and geplitical dynamics.
D. The cmplexity f internatinal relatins in the 21st century.
【精选·名校好题】
Ⅰ
（2024·天津第四十七中联考）Nenad Sestan was wrking in his ffice ne afternn in 2019 when he heard his lab members whispering with excitement ver a micrscpe. He realized smething beynd their expectatins was happening.
The researchers, at Yale Schl f Medicine in New Haven, Cnnecticut, had fund electrical activity in brains taken frm dead pigs. With that shcking result, Sestan realized what had started as a side prject t find ways t better preserve brain tissue fr research had changed int a discvery that culd redefine ur understanding f life and death.
The excitement sn turned t cncern, when the researchers thught they saw widespread, cnsistent electrical activity which can indicate cnsciusness. Sestan brught in a neurlgist, wh determined the readut (信息读出) was actually an errr, but the pssibility had frightened them.
Sestan kept his cl and immediately did tw things: he shut dwn the experiment and cntacted the US Natinal Institutes f Health (NIH), as well as Yale biethicist (生物伦理学家). Over the next few mnths, experts discussed the ptential ethical effects, such as whether the brains culd becme cnscius and whether physicians needed t recnsider the definitin f brain death.
They submitted the wrk t the “Nature”. But befre the final paper was published: Sestan met sharp criticism frm the press. Sme even suggested the researchers were wrking n immrtality (永生), r keeping a rm full f living brains in jars. Neither he r his team wanted t discuss the results until the paper was ut, but as their inbxes filled with cncerns and anger frm animal rights activists and futurists (未来主义者), Sestan became depressed. He felt all they culd d, hwever, was t hld ff n crrecting public misunderstandings until the expert review prcess ended.
Since the paper was published in April, 2023, the team has been s busy with questins frm the media and scientists that it hasn’t perfrmed any further experiments. Sestan wants t fcus n his riginal questins and explre hw lng the brains can be maintained and whether the technlgy can preserve ther rgans.
“We want t get utside pinin befre we d anything.” Sestan says. “When yu explre uncharted area, yu have t be extremely thughtful.”
17．What happened in the lab at Yale Schl f Medicine in 2019?
A．A better methd was fund t keep brain issue.
B．Researchers discvered hw t redefine brain death.
C．Researchers achieved expected results f the experiment.
D．Brains frm dead pigs were accidentally discvered alive.
18．Why did Nenad Sestan stp the experiment?
A．He needed assistance with the final paper.
B．He discvered a majr mistake in the final result.
C．He was cncerned abut the related mral prblems.
D．He was frightened by the pssibility f failure in the future.
19．What was peple’s reactin twards Nenad Sestan’s experiment?
A．Nbdy wanted t discuss the final result in advance!
B．Sme peple supprted the research n immrtality.
C．The press was strngly ppsed t the experiment.
D．The public tk a psitive attitude twards the experiment.
20．Hw culd we best describe Wenad Sestan?
A．Respnsible and reliable.
B．Prfessinal and cautius
C．Helpful and creative.
D．Determined and inspiring.
21．What des the underlined wrd “uncharted” in the last paragraph mean?
A．Hrrible.B．Specific.C．Develped.D．Unknwn.
Ⅱ
（2024·吉林白山高一期末）Mre American businesses are starting t use artificial intelligence(AI)tls t cme up with new ideas and t deal with custmers.
Mattel is knwn fr making children’s tys. The cmpany recently used an AI image generatr (生成器) called DALL-E t cme up with ideas fr new Ht Wheels ty cars. The used vehicle seller CarMax is using ChatGPT t gather thusands f custmer cmments. The scial media service Snapchat has added a chatbt (聊天机器人) t its messaging service. And Instacart, a delivery service, nw uses ChatGPT t answer fd questins. Even the Cca-Cla cmpany plans t use AI t help create new marketing cntent. It has nt said exactly hw it plans t use the technlgy. But the mve shws that businesses are under pressure t use the tls that many f their emplyees and custmers are already trying n their wn.
Sme experts warn that businesses shuld carefully cnsider pssible harms t custmers, sciety, and their wn cmpanies befre chsing t use AI tls in the wrkplace. Chaire Leibwicz wrks at The Partnership n AI, a nnprfit grup. The grup recently released recmmendatins fr cmpanies prducing AI- generated images, audi and ther media. “I want peple t think deeply befre deplying this technlgy” Leibwicz said. “They shuld play arund. . . but we shuld als think, what purpse are these tls serving in the first place?”
While text generatrs like ChatGPT can make the prcess f writing emails and marketing dcuments faster and easier, they als appear t present misinfrmatin as fact. And image generatrs like DALL-E are trained in cpying widely available digital art and phtgraphy. This has raise (版权)cncerns frm the creatrs f thse wrks.
“It is safer t use AI tls as a ‘thught partner’ but still peple as the creatr f final prducts,” said Anna Gressel. She wrks at the law cmpany Debevise & Plimptn, which advises businesses n hw t use AI.
22．Which cmpany made creative prducts with Al tls’ help?
A．Instacart B．Matel
C．CarMax D．Snapchat
23．What can we infer frm the secnd paragraph?
A．Peple rely t much n technlgy in their daily life.
B．AI tls are widely used t help businesses grw.
C．AI tls have an effect n imprving business cnditins.
D．Custmers are mre and mre cnnected nline.
24．What des the underlined wrd “deplying” in paragraph 3 mean?
A．presenting cnfidently
B．prmting successfully
C．debating publicly
D．applying effectively
25．What can we learn frm Anna Gressel’s wrds?
A．AI tls shuld just be humans’ assistants.
B．The use f AI tls shuld be frbidden.
C．A business shuld partner with a law cmpany.
D．Cpyright cncerns are unnecessary
相关试卷
专题28 读书与梦想-2024届高考英语时文阅读外刊精选精练： 这是一份专题28 读书与梦想-2024届高考英语时文阅读外刊精选精练，文件包含专题28读书与梦想-高中英语时文阅读外刊精选精练原卷版docx、专题28读书与梦想-高中英语时文阅读外刊精选精练解析版docx等2份试卷配套教学资源，其中试卷共14页， 欢迎下载使用。
专题27 中国冰城的风味-2024届高考英语时文阅读外刊精选精练： 这是一份专题27 中国冰城的风味-2024届高考英语时文阅读外刊精选精练，文件包含专题27中国冰城的风味-高中英语时文阅读外刊精选精练原卷版docx、专题27中国冰城的风味-高中英语时文阅读外刊精选精练解析版docx等2份试卷配套教学资源，其中试卷共14页， 欢迎下载使用。
专题26 陕西发现4世纪古墓-2024届高考英语时文阅读外刊精选精练： 这是一份专题26 陕西发现4世纪古墓-2024届高考英语时文阅读外刊精选精练，文件包含专题26陕西发现4世纪古墓-高中英语时文阅读外刊精选精练原卷版docx、专题26陕西发现4世纪古墓-高中英语时文阅读外刊精选精练解析版docx等2份试卷配套教学资源，其中试卷共13页， 欢迎下载使用。
